SCANNED BY DUANE TROXEL; NOT SPELLCHECKED OR PROOFREAD THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED ONLINE IN THE HOPE THAT A VOLUNTEER WILL PROOFREAD AND FORMAT IT. IF YOU CAN HELP, PLEASE CONSULT THE STYLE SHEET AT bahai-library.com/editors/style.sheet.html AND THEN WRITE TO JONAH WINTERS. THANK YOU, YOUR HELP IS GREATLY NEEDED! THE NEW HISTORY OF MIRZA ALI-MUHAMMED THE BAB EDWARD G. BROWNE SUBH-I-EZEL, FROM A PHOTOGRAPH BY CAPTAIN YOUNG. THE NEW. HISTORY (TARiKH-I-JADiD) OF MfRZA ALI MUIjAMMED, THE BAB BY MiRZA HUSEYN, OF HAMADAN, COMPOSED A.D. i88o, BEING AN ACCOUNT OF THE ORIGINS AND GROWTH OF THE BABI RELIGION AND ITS FOUNDER TRANSLATED FROM THE PERSIAN AND EDITED WITH EXPLANATORY NOTES, AND APPENDIXES, CONTAINING SUBH-I-EZEL'S NARRATIVE, PERSIAN AND ENGLISH, MfRZ,k JANi'S HISTORY, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS, PRECEDED BY AN HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION, AND AN INDEX WITH A BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE BY MICHAEL BROWNE PHILO PRESS AMSTERDAM First published Cambridge 1893 Reprinted 1975 with a biographical note by Michael Browne, by arrangement with Cambridge University Press, London ISBN 90 6022 315 2 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED I E. G. BROWNE: BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE.' Edward Granville Browne was born in Glouces-1, tershire in 1862 and passed his -youth in New- castle-upon-Tyne. He was educated at _Et , on, (where he found the classical curriculum then. in force boring and impossible), ~ Glenalmond and Pembroke College Cambridge. His interest in Oriental matters was first aroused -by the Russo-Turkish war of 1877 and at Cambridge he read Oriental languages as well as% medicine. His father, a successful engineer.. insisted t a Oriental languages was . too hazardous i as a profession and that he must qualify as a doctor; this he did between going down from Cambridge in 1884 and undertaking his only long visit to Persia in 1887-8. It is this visit which was the subject of A Year amongst the Persians and, as appears from that book, one of his main purposes was to make contact with the Bdbis and to obtain any of their books which he could; the present volume is one of those he obtained. He returned to Cambridge to take up a fellow- ship at Pembroke and, except for comparatively short visits to Turkey, Egypt and North Africa, never left Cambridge again. E. G. BROWNE: BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE. However, he remained in very close touch with Persia through a host of friends and correspon- dents, and not only produced the Literary History of Persia but was also closely concerned in the events following the Persian revolution of 1905. There was a real threat that Persia might be partitioned between Great Britain and Russia, and it was widely believed that his Persia Com- mittee was the decisive factor in the preserva- tion of Persian independence. His private fortune enabled him to help many Persian and other political exiles. He married in 1906 and died in 1926, leaving two sons. His memory is still green in Persia, and within the last decade one of his grand- daughters who spent a year there received much kindness, not only from his old friends and pupils, but also from strangers who felt for him the same kind of affection that the Greeks feel (or till recently felt) for Lord Byron. His statue in Teheran is said to have been the only statue of a European which was spared during the rule of Dr Mossadeg. London 1974. MICHAEL BROWNE. CONTENTS. ~NTRODUCTION, BY THE TRANSLATOR TRANSLATION OF THE AUTHOR'S PREFACE TRANSLATION OF THE NEw HISTORY . APPENDIX L Abridgement of omitted digressions APPENDIX II. Hhji Mirzh Jhni's History APPENDIX III. Translation of Subh-i-Ezel'B Narrative APPENDIX IV. Texts and Translations of Original Documents published in fac-simile INDEX PERSIAN TEXT OF SUBH-i-EZEL's NARRATIVE N. H. PAGE Vii 1 31 320 327 397 420 443 ILLUSTRATIONS. Portrait of Subh-i-Ezel FroWispiece. Plans and Sketches of the Castle of Sheykh Tabarsi 56 North Gate of Zanjhn 146 Fac-simile of Letter from the 136b to MulIA Sheykh 'Ali 424 Nomination of Subh-i-Ezel as the B~b's successor (fac-simile of Subh-i-Ezel's transcript) 426 Fac-simile of Letter from Seyyid Huseyn of Yezd to Hhji Seyyid 'Ali 427 Fac-simile of Letter from Kurratu'l-'Ayn to MullA Sheykh 'Ali . 434 b INTRODUCTION. HALF a century has not yet elapsed since MÕrzà 'Ali Muhammad, the young Seer of Shfrdz, first began' to preach the religion which now counts its martyrs by hundreds and its adherents by hundreds of thousands'; which seemed at, one time to menace the supremacy alike of the- KAjAr dynasty and of the Muhammadan faith in Persia, and may still not improbably prove an important factor in the history of Western Asia; and which, within the memory of, men not yet arrived at an age in any way unusual, has passed- successively through the Prophetic and Apostolic periods, and entered on that phase of intestinal dissensioii and political opportunism whither, sooner or later, every religion I (be the Idea which gave life and strength to the teaching of its Founder never so pure and lofty, and the devotion, self-abnegation, and brotherly concord subsistingg amongst his early disci ples never so perfect) inevitably comes. . Thus it is that, quite apart from the political significance whichg- it may acquire in the future, and the influence which it may exert over the destinies of Persia and the neighbouring states, the BAbi movement cannot fail to attract the atten-' See Curzon's Persia, vol. i, p. 499. The lowest estimate says he, 11 places the present number of BàbÕs in Persia at half a million. I am disposed to think, from conversations with persons well qualified to judge, that the total number is nearer one m i oil. b 2 +viii INTRODUCTION. tion and awaken the curiosity of every student of the Comparative History of Religions. Now the study of the origin and evolution of any religion, ancient or modern, especially of one which aiiihis at effecting a great change in the thought, life, or political organisation of the people amongst whom it arises, is, though invested with a singular charm, fraught with peculiar difficulties. For, at the outset, such religion finds arrayed against itself every vested interest and every deep-rooted prejudice of the dominant dynasty and hierarchy, as well as of all who are, whether by conviction, habit, or considerations of personal advantage, attached to these; and, whether or no it be called upon to face the sword of a tyrant, the sentence of an inquisition, or the rack, the stake, and the axe of the headsman, it is certain to be exposed to the misrepresentations of court-chroniclers and ecclesiastical historians, who will spare no effort to pourtray it under the most sombre and lurid colours with which their imaginations can invest it. Facts will be suppressed or distorted; vague rumours and unfounded slanders will be recorded as assured and indisputable facts; charges of communism, anarchy, free-love, and worse, will be hurled against the innovators. and while, on the one side, occasional excesses and casual acts of violence are represented as the natural and logical outcome of doctrineas subversive alike of morality and humanity, on the other, deeds of treachery and cruelty are passed over in silence, elevated to the dignity of righteous reprisals for inexpiable iniquities, or condoned as measures which, though harsh indeed, were rendered not Only excusable but inevitable by the exigencies of the time. Should the nasceut faith lack strength to outlive this stormy period of probation and persecution, the name of its founder and his adherents will almost certainly be branded with a stigma of infamy froin which oblivion alone will free i p p I INTRODUCTION. +ix them. How different a complexion might the life of Moseylima or the teaching of Mazdak wear if we could but hear the case for the defence, or learn aught about them save that which their triumphaint opponegnts have recorded! But even should the young religion survive this fiery ordeal, and secure for itself a permanent footing amongst the theological systems of the world, new dangers and new sources of misrepresentation of a yet more subtle kind than any to which it has been heretofore exposed spring into being. Hithe'rto these have been wholly or chiefly from without. That whole-hearted devotion to the founder which alone could induce his early disciples to disregard wealth, position, ease, family ties, and even life itself for sake, and that unquestioning faith in his teachings and unhesitating obedience to his commands which is the natural and necessary outcome of this devotion, maintain the community, at least during his lifetime, in concord, harmony, and- fraternal love. Persecution from withoutl the sense of common danger, and the still fresh remembrance of the beloved Master's words and wishes, expressed or implied, may combine to prolong this period for a time, even for a consideraW time, after his death; but, sooner or later, dissensions, schisms, and internecine strifes are sure to arise. A cessation or abatement of the persecutions which have hitherto compelled the members of the community tocombine all their powers in resisting the common foe, and to present a united front towards their oppressors, now at length gives them leisure to examine more, minutely and critically the doctrines bequeathed to them ; attempts are made to weld these doctrines into a logical and coherent system ; differences of temperament, training, and aspira-, tion, hitherto latent, become manifest; ambitions, hithertQ held in check, burst forth; rival claimants arise to contest the supremacy; new circumstances and altered relations I t +x i INTRODUCTION. to the environment suggest to the bolder and more active spirits modifications and developments of the primitive doctrine, of which, perhaps, the founder never dreamed; and an energy and tenacity of purpose which were developed by the need of uniting the young church against a common foe are expended in dividing it against itself. Now, alas! the golden age of the new religion is past, or all but past ; the heaven-inspired proplict, the loving, untiring, undoubting apostle, and the pale martyr, who, with the smile of victory on his lips, and widely opened eyes fixed on the far distance, as though to discern through the lurid flames of the bale-fire some glimpse of the promised Utopia, fade from the page of its history, which henceforth is filled with pitiful tales of dissension and disruption; of anathemas and accusations of heresy and apostasy reiterated and reciprocated with increasing bitterness; of suppressions of unwelcome records and corruptions of inconvenient textas ; of fratricidal assassinations and persecutions. Of this golden age of faith the records are usually scanty, but, in their primitive forin, simple, truthful, and worthy of credence in the main, though not improbably 01le-sided, exaggerated, coiifua-,ed, and rude in style. The eneiiiies of a new religion do not corrupt its records, they destroy them; and what escapeas destruction at their hands, and subsequent corruption at the hands of partisans, may be trusted to give a tolerably faithful narrative of its early history. For the earliest historians of a religion are, as a rule, so full of faith, so lacking in critical or sceptical habits, so ready to accept whatever new ideals may be set before them, so prone to discover a hidden wisdom in every act, not only the most trivial, but the inoast questionable, which emanates from their Master and his immediate disciples, that they will chronicle with scrupulous fidelity inci idelity inci +xi dents which a later and more critical generation of believers would be strongly tempted to suppress or to transfigure. When Ibn HishAm came to re-write Ibn Is-h6k ) s biography of the Prophet Muhammad, he judged it expedient to omit certain details which appeared to him unedifying and likely to cause scandal to the faithful; and - when a modern MusulmAn, like Syed Ameer Ali, composes a history of Islim for English readers, he is tempted to touch very lightly on certain matters which Ibn HishAm saw no cause to include in this category. To take another instance h alto_ gether, might not a modern Buddhist, especially if he were an European, feel disposed to allow the fact that Buddha's death was accelerated by eating pork to sink into oblivion, although this fact casts no reflection on the life of that great and virtuous teacher, but only contravenes our ideas of what is graceful and artisti6 ? " But," it will be asked, " does it often happen that these earliest records of a religious movement, supposing them to be written witgh this perfect candour, and to escape destruction at the hands of foes, retain for long their primitive form ? If the doctrines of the teacher whoseh lifel deeds, and words they chronicle prevail, and so the records survive, what guarantee can we have that they have not wliiidergone mutilation or received embellishment at the hands of his later followers, from whom almost necessarily we must receive them?" Generally, from the very,nature of the case, such assurance is difficult to obtain, ~and, indeed, can only be obtained in its most satisfactory form when the early records pass within a short time, after their compilation into the hands of strangers, who, while interested in their preservation, have no desire to alter them for better or worse. That this should happen at all obviously requires a very unusual combination of circumstances. 9 So far as my knowledge goes, it never has happened save in +xii the case of the Bibf religion; and this is one of the facts which invest the history of this religion with so special an interest. Fifty years ago Persia be ' longed to all intents and,purposes (as, indeed, she still belongs, notwithstanding the attempts recently made, to the huge delight of certain nostrum-mongers and vendors of universal panaceas, to overlay the court and capital of her present rulers with a thin veneer of tawdry European civilisation) to the ancient world. There hardly anything is impossible, and not very many things even grossly improbable. That a young visionary should arise proclaiming a new religion designed to replace and supersede all existing creeds; that many persons of learning, virtue, and position should eagerly embrace and boldly proclaim his doctrines that gorgeous but unsubstantial visions of a New Creation wherein there should be neither injustice nor discord, of a Reign of God's Saints on earth, and of a Universal Theocracy conformed in every detail to a mystical Theosophy (wherein are blended, under the guise of an ultra-Shi'ite nationalism, theories of numbers more fantastic than those of Pythagoras or Plotinus, with theories of the Divine Names and Attributes more intangible than those of the Cabbala or of Spinoza) should exercise so powerful an influence, not only over philosophers and scholars, but over peasants and artisans, as to make them ready and eager to meet death in its most terrible forms not by scores, but by hundreds; that this new faith, set forth, for the most part, not in the language of the people, but in Arabic treatises of interminable length, at once florid and incorrect in style, teeming with grammatical errors the nioa-,t glaring, iterations the most wearisome, and words the rarest and most incomprehensible, should have power to inspire its votaries with a courage so stubborn as to threaten for several years the very existence +xiii of the es ' tablished religion and the reigning dynasty, and should stir up an iiisurrectioihi which all the armed forces of the Persian king, all the anathemas of the Muhammadan clergy, all the tortures which an Asiatic tyrant could devise or his myrmidons execute ' could, by dint of ruthless and repeated massacres, only check for a while, but not permanently subdue - all this, however strange it may seem to an European, is in the history of the East not much more remarkable than is the accession of a new dynasty, the partition of a principality, or the annexation of a province in the history of the West. The doctrines of the BAb, it is true, formed together a system bold, original, and, to the Persian mind, singularly attractive; but, taken separately, there was hardly one of which he could claim to be the author, and not very many which did not remount to a remote antiquity. The title of Ba'b ("Gate") had been already assumed, not only by the four intimates of the Twelfth ImAngi, but by a heresiarch who was put to death in the tenth century of our era by the Caliph er-RAdhf Bi'llAh. The theories advanced by Mirzi 'Ali Mul ' iammad concerning the successive incarnations of the Universal Reason, thb allegorical interpretation of Scripture, and the symbolism of every ritual form and every natural phenomenon, differ in no essential particular from those hel& by the Isma'flfs. Even the virtues of the number nineteen, the mysterious " Number of the Unity," had been already signalized, and that, probably, not for -the first time, by Sheykh Muhiyyu 'd-Din ibnu'l-'Arabf, a renowned Sftff teacher who flourished in tghe twelfth century of our era!. The personal influence of the BAb ; the extraordinary steadfastness and devotion of his followers under perse See Traveller's iYarrative, vol. ii, p. 229. See J. R. A. S. for 1889, pp. 909, n. 2, and 919-920. xiv INTRODUCTION. INTRODUCTION. XV cution of a severity almost unparalleled in modern times ; the dramatic circumstances attending the earlier history of the sect, from its foundation in A.D. 1844 till the martyrdom of its Founder in A.D. 1850, and of all but a very few of his original apostles in A.D. 1852, were indeed exceptional; yet, notwithstanding all this, it might easily have happened that the materials for a continuous and authentic history of the movement should have been wanting, in which case we should have had to trust the inaccurate and garbled accounts of the court-historians, LiS621117-14fulk and Rizi- Kulf KhAn', till such time as the scarcely more impartial .Traveller's Narrative%" written anonymously (as I have learned only since its publication) by the son of one aspirant to the supreme authority in the now divided Church to discredit the perfectly legitimate claims and to disparage the perfectly blameless character of his less successful rival, came to increase our mystification and plunge us into further uncertainties- Fortunately for science a happy combination of circum- stances averted a too probable, but none the less deplorable, contingency. Amongst the early disciples of the Bdb was a certain merchant of KAshAn, HAjf MÕrzà Jdnf by name, who, together with two of his three brothers, HAjf MÕrzà IsmAT and HAjf MÕrzà Ahmad', was remarkable for his enthusiastic devotion to the new religion. When, in the year 1847, the BAb passed by KAshdn on the way to his prison at MAk* ' MÕrzà JAnf bribed the escort to allow their illustrious captive to be a guest in his house for two days I Cf. Traveller's Narrative, vol. ii, pp. 173-4, 186-8, and 192. 2 Presented to me by the author during my visit to Acre in April 1890; published in fac-simile, with EDglish translation, Introduction, and Notes, by the Cambridge University Press in 1891. 3 See Traveller's Narrative, vol. ii, p. 332. I f i and nights'. While the MizandarAn insurrection 'was in progress (A.D. 1848-9), he, in company with BehAV114h, Subh-i-Ezel, and several other prominent BàbÕs', at- tempted, but failed, to join the garrison of Sheykh Tabarsf, fell into the hands of the enemy, and was imprisoned for some while at A'mul. We find him, always impelled, as it would appear, by religious zeal, now at BArfurAsh, now at Mash-had, now at TeherAn. He appears to have been personally acquainted not only with the BAb, Subh-i-Ezel, and BehA'u'llAh, but with HAjf SuleymAn KhAn, MullA Muhammad 'Alf of Zauj An, Seyyid YahyaA of DArAb, MullA Sheykh 'Alf " Jena'b-i-'Az11'M," Kurratu'l-,Ayii, " ffa;rat-i- Kudd,(ts," and almost all the early apostles of the BàbÕ religion. Finally, in company with twenty-seven -of his co-religionists, he suffered martyrdom for the faith at TeherAii on September 15th, 18521. He was therefore heart and soul a BàbÕ ; lie had the best possible oppor- tunities for obtaining detailed and accurate - information about every event connected with the movement during the first eight years of its existence (A.D. 1844-1852); ZD and lie enjoyed a high reputation for truthfulness, intelli- gence, and integrity4. Most fortunately, also, he occupied his leisure moments during the two years which elapsed between the martyrdom of his Master (July 9th, 1850) and his own death (Sept. 15th, 1852) in composing a voluminous work, to which, from considerations of a mystical and not very comprehensible character, lie gave the rather fanciful name of Nuktatu'l-Kdf ("The Point of KAf," i.e., as it would appear, "of KAshAn")1, on the doctrines and hiastory I See pp. 213-216 infra, and footnotes. 2 Cf. pp. 64-5 and 378-9 infra. 3 See Traveller's Narrative, vol. ii, pp. 323-334. 4 Of. pp. xxxix and 57 infra. 6 See n. I on p. 391 infra. The passage in which the title of F xvi INTRODUCTION. INTRODUCTION. xvii of the religion for which, probably only a few months after the completion of his labours, he shlifrered death. It is superfluous to say that MÕrzà JAni's work never existed save in manuscript,, and that any copies which passed into the hands of the royalist or orthodox party were without doubt at once destroyed. For there was nothing of caution, compromise or concealment about the honest KAshAnf merchant. The BàbÕs of his time looked rather for an immediate triumph over all existing powers, culminating in the universal establishment of the True Faith and the Reign of God's Saints on Earth, than for the book is given occurs near the beginning of the work and runs Z3 as follows:- a Heaven of Glory, a far-distant Millennium, or " the Most Great Peace" on which BehA and his followers love. to dilate'. They did not make any profession of loyalty to, or love for, the reigning dynasty; nor did they attempt to exonerate the ShAh from the responsibility of the perse- cutions -which they suffered at the expense of his ministers or tghe MusnImAn divines, as later BàbÕ historians have doDe'. They hated the Muhammadan clergy, it is true, with an intense and bitter hatred, and MÕrzà JAnf antici- pates with exultation a day whereon the KA'im, or Messiah, of the Family of Muhammad shall behead seventy thou- sand mull4s "like clogs"; but they entertained for the KAjAr rulers an equal hatred, which MÕrzà JAnf is at no pains to disguise. To N6siru'd-Din, the present ShAh, and to his father, Muhammad ShAh, such terms as "tyrant"",. L&JU), "scoundrel" unrightful king"' (J.61y :)Uo.U), and "progeny of Abfi SofyAn (,~j I J I are freely applied. Teherin is compared- to.- Daulaasevis, the capital of the wicked Mu'iviya and his yet more wicked son Yazid; while Mul1A Huseyn is likened to the martyred ImAm Huseyn, Sheykh Tabarsf to the immortal plain of KerbelA, and BArfurAsh, whither the BàbÕ captives, were brought after the conclusion of the siege, to I(Afa. ZD The battle-cry of the royalist soldiers, " Y6 N6siru'd-Dlhi Sh'A i described as " a foul watch-word a 8 the death of Muhammad ShAh is noted in the words when Muhammad Sh6h went to hell3"; and the unbelievers are flouted with scorn because they suppose that the Promised Deliverer whom they expect will confirm I Cf. Traveller's Narrative, Vol. ii, pp. A 2 Cf. Traveller's Narrative, Vol. ii, pp. xlv-xlvi; and, amongst many other similar passages in this book, pp. 172, 180-182, 189-190, 278-279, 291-293, and 315-316. 3 See n. I on p. 291 infra. xviii INTRODUCTION. INTRODUCTION. xiX the authority of the existing rulers and governors, aiid recognition and homage of the whole BàbÕ community'. will subdue the world for the benefit of NAsiru'd-Dfn Till the catastrophe of September 1852, which proved fatal, ShAh. not only to MÕrzà Jinf, but to nearly all the principal Now if this were all, MÕrzà JAnf's history, though it apostles of the new faith -who bad survived the earlier would certainly have been destroyed as far as possible by persecutions, he remained for the most part in the neigh- rAn in the summer, and in the district of the Muhammadans and the royalists, might well, with bourhood of Tehe sundry emendations and expurgations, have been preserved NAr in MdzandarAn in the winter, actively occupied in almost intact, like many other proscribed books, in the iDg, transcribing, and eirculg ing the BàbÕ books, arrang at bosom of the BA-bf Church. But it is not all. Events preaching and expohlinding the BàbÕ doctrine, and com- which I have elsewhere discussed at length', and shall here, forting and edifying the BàbÕ Church'. It was during this period, and, as internal evidence renders probable, during for the benefit of the general reader, briefly recapitulate, 3 brought about the seemingly strange result that a lar(Te the year A.H. 1267 (Nov. 1850-Oct. 1851) that Mirzi majority of the BAbias themselves carne to have a direct Jdn' composed his work, in which, as was only natural, he interest in the suppression of this precious record. One inserted a long notice on Subh-i-Ezel4, whom he most of the chief doctrines of the BAb, one which lie never certainly, and his contemporaries in the faith most probably, wearies of repeating and emphasising, is that his revelation believed to be none other than " He whom God shall is not final; that he is not the last of the Theophanies manifest'." The evidence that at this period, and for which, at longer or shorter intervals shine- forth in the some considerable time afterwards, Subh-i-Ezel, now living Phenomenal World for the guidance of mankind; and in almost solitary exile at Famagusta in Cyprus, a pensioner- that after him a greater Revealer, whom lie calls Man I Cf. Gobineau's Iteligions et Pljilosophies dans IAsie, Centrale, yudli-Airulitt'1161i" ("He whom God shall nhianifest "), shall pp. 277-8~ appear for the consolation of his followers. Now a year 2 See Traveller's Xarrativc, Vol. ii, p. 374. before his martyrdonhi, on the fall of Sheykh Tabarsf and 3 The clearest allusion in Mfrzi idnif's work to the date of its- the death of H4rat-i-Kuddits (July or August, 1849)1, composition is contained in the words (occurring on f. 48r of the BAb nominated Mfrzi YahyA (then a lad of nineteen3) Suppl. Pers. 1071, and f 335 2- of StTpl. Pers. 1070) 4-r= to succeed him under the title of 8ubh-i-Ezel ("the Morn- ing of Eternity"), or Ilazrat-i-Ezel ("His Holiness the "To day, when one thousand two hundred and seventy-seven Eternal"). The nomination was explicit and notorious, years have elapsed since the Mission and, on the death of the Founder in July 1850, the youth- of God's Apostle " The BàbÕs generally date not from the hijra b ful vicegerent at once received the almost unanimous or Flight of the Prophet, but from his Call (ba'that), which they p place ten years earlier. Hence this date corresponds to A.H. I Traveller's Yarrative, Vol. ii, pp. xv-xviii and 349 et seq. 1267. 4 See pp. .374-394 infra. I See pp. 380-2 infra. 3 See Traveller's Narrative, Vol. ii, p. 373 and note. 5 See pp. 381-2 infra. xx INTRODUCTION. INTRODUCTION. xxi of the British Government, held undisputed and absolute sway over the BàbÕ Church is absolutely conclusive. Immediately after the great persecution and massacre of 1852, Subh-i-Ezel fled to Baghdad, so as to be beyond the reach of the Persian Government. Hither a few months later (at the end of 1852 or beginning of 1853') lie was followed by his half-brother, MirzA Huseyn 'Alf BeWt'u'116h, who was thirteen years his senior, and -who, p arrested on suspicion of complicity in the attem t made by the BàbÕs on the Sh6h's life .. had just been acquitted and released from an imprisonment of four montlis' dura- tion. At this time and for some years later (at any rate till 1858) Behi'ii'lldh was, as liias own writings prove', to all appearance as loyal a follower of Subh-i-Ezel as he had previously been of the Bdb. The BàbÕ Church was still, in spite of the attempts made by sundry ambitious persons to advance claims to the supreme autliority3, united tinder Subh-i-Ezel, and its members no doubt continued to read with edification the pages of Mirz6 JAni's history. About 1862 the Turkish Government, acting, as it would appear, on the representations of the ShAh's minis- ters, decided to transfer the BAbi exiles from Baghdad to Adrianople, whither, it would seem, they were actually brought in December 1863 4. Here they remained till July or August 1868, when signs of renewed -and increased activity amongst them attracted the notice of the Ottoman authorities, who, learning that a schism had divided them 1 See J. R. A. S. for 1892, pp. 304-6. 2 See J. R. A. S. for 1892, pp. 304-6 and 436-8. 3 See Tgi,az,elle?,'s Narrative, vol. ii, pp. 356-8 and 365. 4 The chronology of these events is less certain than that of the earlier ones. I have done my best to reconcile and combine the various and sometimes conflicting data at pp. 306-8 of the .1. R. A. S. for 1892. I into two hostile sections, the one headed by Behi'u'lhih, the other by ~ubh-i-Ezel, packed them off without more ado, and probably without troubling to enquire much into the rights and wrongs of the matter, the former to Acre, the latter to Famagusta in Cyprus. About the subsequent history of the Bdbfs, of which full accounts will be found, by such as it may interest, in the Traveller's Narrative, I do not propose to say any- thing in this place. Concerning the schism itself, however, a few words are necessary. A community like that which had existed at Adrianople, consisting almost entirely of actual exiles and potential martyrs, and in large part of religious enthusiasts, revolutionary visionaries, and specu- lative mystics, whose grestless activity, debarred from ex- ternal action, is pent up within limits too narrow for its free exercise, requires a firm hand to control and direct its energies. Such firmness Subh-i-Ezel, a peace-loving, contemplative, gentle soul, wh~olly'devoted to the memory of his beloved Master, caring little for authority, and in- capable of self-assertion, seems to have altogether lacked. Even while at Baghdad he lived a life of almost complete seclusion, leaving the direction of affairs in the bands of his half-brother Behi'u'llAh', a man of much more resolute and ambitious character, who thus gradually became the most prominent figure and the moving spirit of the sect. For a considerable time BehAVIIAh continued to do all that he did in the name, and ostensibly by the instruc- tions, of Subh-i-Ezel; but after a while, though at what precise date is still uncertain, the idea seems to have entered his mind that he might as well become actually, as he already was virtually, the Pontiff of the Church wlioa,3e destinies he controlled. It was not, however, till 1 See Traveller's Narrative, vol. ii, pp. 356-8. N. If. 0 a I xxii INTRODUCTION. the BàbÕs had been for two or three years at Adrianople that, most probably in the summer of 1866', lie threw off all disguise, publicly proclaimed himself to be " Him whom God shall manifest," and called upon Subli-i-Ezel and -all the BàbÕ Churches throughout Persia, Turkey, Egypt and Syria to acknowledge his supreme authority, and to accept as God's Word the revelations which he forthwith began to promulgate, and continued till his death on May 16th of last year (1892) to publish. Amongst the BàbÕs the effect of this announcement (for which, no doubt, the way had been already prepared) ivaas little short of stupendous. From Constantinople to KirmAn and from Cairo to KhurAsAn the communities of the faith-, ful were rent asunder by a schism which every subsequent year has rendered wider and more permanent, and which nothing short of the complete extinction of one of the two rival factions can possibly heal. At Adrianople itself the struggle was short and the triumph of BehA complete. Subh-i-Ezel was so completely deserted that, as lie himself informed me, he and his little boy had to go themselves to the bazaar to buy their food. Elsewhere, though active and astute emissaries' were at once despatched in all directions by BeliA, the conflict, though its issue was from the first hardly doubtful, was longer maintained. For the question at issue was not merely whether one leader should be replaced by another, whether certain doctrines should be understood in this way or in that, or whether the ethics, practices, or forms of worship of the sect should be re- formed or modified (all of which things, as we well know, have again and again in the history of religions proved sufficient to create the fiercest enmities, the profoundeast I See J. R. A. S. for 1892, p. 304. 2 Cf. J. R. A. 8. for 1892, pp. 311-312. h p h b INTRODUCTION. XXIII heart-searchings, and the bitterest dissensions), but~l whether the doctrines and writings of the beloved Master, for which his followers had been ready to suffer death or exile, were to be regarded as abrogated and cancelled in favour of, a new revelation; whether his chosen vicegerent, whom they had so long regarded as their Supreme Pontiff and as the incarnation of all purity, virtue, and heavenly wisdom, was to be cast down from this high position, and branded as " the First Letter of Denial " of the New Dispensation ; and whether the BAb himself was henceforth to be looked upon, not as the " Point of Revelation," a veritable Mani- festation of the Divine, but as a mere harbinger and pre- cursor of a more perfect Theophany. BàbÕs who remember that time cannot easily be induced to speak of it ; -only once, so far as I can remember, did I hear a follower of Behi explicitly allude to it. " I was long torn with doubts," said he, "which were finally removed by this verse on which one day I chanced in the Beyan: 'Thou takest Divinity from whomsoever Tlwu pleasest, and givest Di- villity to whomsoever Tliou pleasest: verily Thou art the Almighty, the Wise."' How long the contest was maintained by the Ezelfs, or old Bibfs, against the innovators it is impossible to say, for on no portion of the history of the sect is our infor- mation so scanty or our light so dim. At first not a few prominent BàbÕs, including even several " Letters of the Living" and personal friends of the BAb, adhered faithfa~ly to Subh-i-Ezel. One by one these disappeared, most of them , as I fear cannot be doubted, by foul play on the part of too zealous BebA'fs. Hiji Seyyid Muhammad of IsfahAn, one of the BAb's " Companions " (aq-~db), MÕrzà RizA-Kulf and his brother MÕrzà Naqru'llAh of Tafrfsh) .46 JAn Beg of KAshAn, and other devoted Ezelis,,were stabbed or poisoned at Adrianople and Acre. Two of the Letters 2 s xxiv INTRODUCTION. INTRODUCTION. XXV of the Living," Seyyid 'Alf the Arab, and Mulhi manifest" to abrogate, change, can eel, and develop the earlier Rajab 'Alf lCahh-, were assassinated, the one at Tabriz, doctrines. ' His chief aim seems to have been to introduce the other at KerbelA. The brother of the latter, A' kA 'Alf a more settled order, to discourage speculation, to direct Muhammad, was also murdered in Baghdad; and, indeed, the attention of his followers to practical reforms pursued in a prudent and unobtrusive fashion, to exalt ethics at of the more prominent 134bis who espoused the cause, of Ezel, Seyyid JawAd of KerbelA (who died at KirmAn about the expense of metaphysics, to check mysticism, to con- 1884)1 seems to have been almost the only one, with the ciliate existing authorities, including even the ShAh of exception of Ezel himself, who long survived what the Persia, the Nero of the BàbÕ faith, to abolish useless, un- practical, and irksome regulations and restrictions, and) Ezelfs call " the Direful Mischief " (fihia-i-saylanz). From in general, to adapt the religion at the head of which he that time forwards, while the Belid'fs have been ever waxing now found higmself to the ordinary exigencies of life, and in power and influence, so that their numbers now probably reach or even exceed half a million souls, the Ezelis have to render it more capable of becoming, what he intended been ever waning, until at the present time it is doubtful to make it, a universal system suitable to all mankind'. A whether in all they amount to more than a few hundreds. remembrance of all the wrongs which he and his co-religi- It is even doubtful whether the recent death of BeliA will onists had suffered at the hands of the Musulmins further contribute in any sensible measure to the restoration of caused him gradually but steadily to eliminate the tinge their failing fortunes, though Ezel still lives, and numbers of Muhammadan, and more especially of Shi'ite, thought amongst his supporters at least one or two men of energy which the BàbÕ doctrine still maintained, while ever seek- and ability. ing a better understanding with the -Christians, Jews, and Zoroastrians with all of whom he recommended his fol- At the present day, therefore, the vast majority of I BAbis are Behi'fs, whose doctrines, sentiments, and ideals lowers to consort on friendly tern-is. Now once admitting Behi's right to assume this posi- are already far removed from those of the primitive BàbÕs tion of supremacy at all, there can be no question that or modern Ezelfs. No sooner was BehA. firmly established these changes were beneficial and salutary. The original in his authority than lie began to make free use, of the privilege accorded by the BAb to " Him whom God shall See especially the summary of contents of the Kitdb-i- Akdas at pp. 972-981 of the J.R.A.S. for 1889; and the Lawh-i- Cf. J. R. A. S. for 1892, pp. 443-4 and 684; and Traveller's Bashdrdt, of which the text (with the exception of the 15th and Al'arrative, vol. ii, p. 342, n. 2. That Seyyid Jawaid was a follower last clause, recommending constitutional government, which the of Ezel is, however, categorically denied by Mfrzi AbA'I-Fazl of BehA'is appear to have thought it expedient to suppress in the copy of the tract forwarded to Russia) has been published by GuIpAyagAn in a letter addressed to M. Touniansky, the text of which will be found on pp. 44-5 of vol. viii of the Zapisski of Baron Rosen with a Russian translation at pp. 183--192 of vol. the Oriental Section of the Imperial Russian Archaeological vii of the Zapisski of the Oriental Section of the Imperial Russian Societ . As, however, this is affirmed equally positively by ~ubh_ Archaeological Society (St Petersburg, 1893). The substance y of this latter document has been stated in English by myself at i-Ezel and Sheykh A- the Ezelf, I have allowed these words to stand. pp. 678-9 of the J. R. A. & for 1892. I xxvi INTRODUCTION. doctrine of the BAb, fascinating as it was to Persians of a certain disposition, was utterly unfitted for the bulk of mankind, and could never by any possibility have taken any root outside Persia. In the sacred books wherein it was set forth, precept bore but a small proportion to dogma, and dogma a still smaller proportion to doxologies and mystical rhapsodies of almost inconceivable incompre- hensibility. Not only were the positive precepts few, but they were generally quite unpractical, and not rarely extremely inconvenient. What, for instance, could be more unpractical than the adoption of the number 19 as the basis of all measures and calculations; the command that all books when they had been in existence for 202 years should be copied out afresh, and the originals de- stroyed or given away; or the elaborate ceremonies pre- scribed for the interment of the dead ? What more incon- venient than the exclusion of all unbelievers from five of the chief pr ovinces of Persia,- and, save in the case of merchants and others following a useful profession, from all lands in which the BàbÕ faith prevailed; the discourage- ment of sea-voyages and of the acquisition of foreign lan- guages ; and the command to destroy all works treating of Logic, Jurisprudence, and Philosophy ? Great conceptions, noble ideals, subtle metaphysical conceptions, and splendid, though ill-defined, aspirations do, indeed, exist in the BeyAn; but they are so lost in trackless mazes of rhapsody and mysticism, so weighed down by trivial injunctions and impracticable ordinances, that no casual reader, but only a student of considerable diligence and perseverance, can hope to find them'. That the development of BehA's doctrines proceeded 1 For a summary account of the teachiDgs of the Persian Beydn, the most systematic and comprehensible of the BAb'aa3 many works, see pp. 911-933 of the J. R. A. S. for 1889. 'Y INTRODUCTION. xxvii h gradually there can be little doubt, for a system such as he elaborated could not be worked out, much less imposed on a scattered church not always remarkable for docility, in a brief space of time. From the moment that his claims were generally recognized by the BàbÕs, however, the whole of the earlier literature of the sect, including the writings of the Bib himself, began to suffer neglect and to sink into oblivion. Without admitting the assertion made by the Ezelfs, that BehA and his followers deliberately de- stroyed, or fraudulently tampered with, the books belonging to the older dispensation on a large scale, it is clear that the conditions which could alone secure the - continual transcription and circulation of these books had ceased to' exist. They were, for the most part, voluminous, hard to comprehend, uncouth in style, unsystematic in arrange- ment, filled with iterations and solecisms) and not un- frequently quite incoherent and unintelligible to' any ordinary reader.- Hitherto, less on their own merits than by reason of the enthusiastic devotion inspired by their authors, they had been regarded by all the BAbis as price- less gems. Of this enthusiastic devotion BehA now became the object; and to his writings (which, at any rate in comparison with those of his predecessors, were terse, lucid, vigorous, and eloquent) was this sentiment of admiration diverted. The energies of the Behi'f scribes were fully occupied in transcribing the new revelations; and the older books, no longer regarded as the final expression of Divine Truth and Wisdom, ceased to be renewed, and for the most part reposed undisturbed and forgotten. in the shelves and boxes to which they had been consigned. All this, of course, applies only to the BehA'fs; but the Ezelfs,' to whom the old books still retained their pristine value, were few in number, isolated, fearful alike of the Mu- hammadaus and the Behi'fs, and altogether incapable of xxviii INTRODUCTION. maintaining the currency of the discarded literature. Be- sides this, many of the older writings at the time of the schism were probably preserved only at the BàbÕ head- quarters in Adrianople, where, as we have seen, Subh-i- Ezel was left entirely without supporters. What he could, he saved, and bore with him to Cyprus; but there can be no doubt that the lion's share fell to BehA, and was con- veyed by him and his followers to Acre. And, from my own experience, I can affirm that, hard as it is to obtain from the BehA'fs in Persia the loan or gift of BàbÕ books belonging to the earlier period of the faith, at Acre it ias harder still even to get a glimpse of them. They may be, and probably are, still preserved there, but, for all the good the enquirer is likely to get from them, they might almost as well have suffered the fate which the Ezelfs believe to have overtaken them. The history composed by Hiji MÕrzà JAnf, however, belongs to a different category from the writings which we have hitherto been discussing. Without sharing the sacred character of these, it was incomparably more dan- gerous to the pretensions and plans of Behi, as any one may see by referring to Appendix 11 of this volume. Its to-ne towards all beyond the pale of the BàbÕ Church, and more especially towards the ShAh of Persia and his govern- ment, was irreconcilably hostile. The doctrines set forth in it, though undoubtedly those held by the early BàbÕ.9, were eminently calculated to encourage mysticism and metaphysical speculation of the boldest kind, and to main- tain in full activity that pantheistic fermentation which BehA was so desirous to check. Worst of all, it supplied the Ezelfs with a most powerful weapon not of defence only, but of attack. And withal it was interesting, pro- foundly and intensely interesting; the most interesting book, perhaps, in the whole range of BàbÕ literature. To i I I INTRODUCTION. I xxiX suppressit and withdraw it from circulation, at any rate while thoser on whom had been thrown the glamour of the young ShirAzf Seer and of the beautiful Kurratu'l-'Ayn, the martyred heroine and poetess of Kazvfn, constituted the majority of the faithful, was almost impossible; to let it continue to circulate in its present form would be dis- astrous. Only one plan offered any chance of success. Often in the literary history of the East has the disappear- ance and extinction of works both valuable and of general interest been brought about, either accidentally or inten- tionally, by the compilation from them of a more concise and popular abridgement which has gradually superseded them. As the Biography of the Prophet Muhammad composed by Ibn Is-hAk was superseded by the recension of Ibn Hish6m., so should MÕrzà J&nf's old history of the Bib and his Apostles be superseded by a revised, expurgated, and emended 11NEw HISTORY" (Tdrikh-i-Jadid), which, while, carefully omitting every fact, doctrine, ahnd expTeSSiOn calcu- lated to injure the policy of BehA, or to give offence to his followers, should preserve, and even supplement with new material derived from fresh sources, the substance of the earlier chronicle. 0 nly by the merest accident, so far as our present knowledge goes, did this scheme fail of complete success. Most fortunately for science, there resided at TeherAn in the years 1855-8 a French diplomatist, the Comte de Gobineau, who, animated by a keen and insatiable curiosity, devoted himself with rare success to the study of the BàbÕ religion, which was at that time still in its primitive state, neither rent asunder by the schism which now divides it, nor modified by the policy which that schism has intro- dneed. The results of his labours, so far as the B6bfs are concerned, were a masterly sketch of their history and doctrines in his classical Religions et Philosophies daus xxx INTRODUCTION. I'Asie Centrale, and a small but most precious collection of BàbÕ manuscripts; this, after his death, was bought by the Biblioth~que Nationale at Paris, where, since the year 1884, it has been deposited. Of these volumes one (Suppl. Persan, 1,071) contains the whole, and another (Suppl. Persan, 1,070) the first third, of HAjf MÕrzà JAnf's invaluable history, of which, so far as I know, no other copy is extant in Europe or Asia. It is not too much to say that but for M. de Gobineau's exertions in the cause of science it would have been impossible to reconstruct faithfully and in detail the early history of BàbÕism. At this point I shall perhaps do well to answer two questions which may suggest themselves to the reader. 11 Why," he may ask in the first place, " have you chosen to translate this later 'New History' in preference to Mfrzd JAnfs contemporary record, to which you evidently attach a much greater importance ? " This question can be answered in very few -words. I did not discover the existence of the Paris manuscripts of MÕrzà JAW's history till this translation of the New His- tory had been completed, and the arraDgements for its publication finally concluded. That there was such a work, I had learned from the New History itself; and, as may be supposed, I made many efforts to procure a copy, or to discover whether any still existed. After repeated disappointments, I finally came to the conclusion that the work was probably lost. When, in the Easter Vacation of 1892, 1 finally chanced on it in the Biblioth6que Na- tionale during a short stay in Paris, it was too late to substitute a translation of it for the present history. It only remained for me to procure a transcript of it (from the complete manuscript, SuppL Pers. 1,071), to compare this carefully with the New History, and to epitomize in an appendix the results yielded by this comparison. The INTRODUCTION. xxxi transcript was made for me by my friend Ahi~ed Beg Agaeff, to whom I here tender my sincere thanks -, and the variants and additional matter obtained by the comparison of this with the New History will be found fully stated in Appendix II (pp. 327-396) at the end of this volume. For the present this must suffice; but, if the history of BàbÕism. is to be seriously studied, the text of MÕrzà JAnfs history will, sooner or later, have to be published in ex- tenso. For this reason I now deem it a most fortunate circumstance that the Syndics of the University Press, when they accepted the present translation, were re- luctant to incur t ' he great expense which the publica- tion of the text of the TdrUk-i-Jadid would have involved. The second question which may be asked is this. C(What relation exists between the history of the BàbÕ religion entitled 'A Traveller's Narrative written to illustrate the Episode of the B(tb,' of which you published the text and translation rather more than a'year ago; and these two histories which you have just been discuss- ing ? " This question also I must answer very briefly. The Traveller's Narrative, composed by BehA'ullAh's son 'AbbAs Efendf so recently as A.D. 1886, represents a further de- velopment of the tendency, to which 1 have already alluded, to glorify BehAu'llAh and his Neo-BàbÕ doctrine at the expense of the BAb and the primitive BAbl theology. In the New History it is still the BAb and his apostles, and the early martyrs of the cause, whose'words and deeds form the subject-matter of the work. In the Traveller's Narrative this is no longer the case; it is Bebi'u'llih who is the hero, and it is his words and precepts which are quoted with admiration and reverence, while the BAb has been reduced from his high station of I Point, " I I KA'im, " xxxii INTRODUCTION. and " ImAm Malidi " to that of a more precursor and harbinger of a more perfect dispensation'. Having now, as I trust, made sufficiently clear the relations which subsist between these three histories, to wit, the Nuktatu'I-K(if composed by MÕrzà JAnf in A.D. 1851; the irtrikh-i-Jadi'd, or "New History," composed (as will presently be set forth in greater detail) -under the supervision of MAnakjf the Zoroastrian by Mfrzi Huseyn of HamadAn, assisted by TAlfrzA Abii'l-Fazl of GulpAyagAii, in A.H. 1297-8 (A.D. 1880); and the 14fakaila-i-shaklist' 'k or "Traveller's Narrative," coniposed by BehA'u sayya. , 'llAh's son 'AbbAs Efendi in or about the year A.D. 1886, I shall now discuss iihiore minutely the date and author- ship of the second of these works, here offered in transla- tion to the English-reading public, and describe the manner in which I first became acquainted with it, the manu- scripts which I have had at my disposal, and my labours in re-establishing and translating the text. First, as regards the date and authorship. Concerning these something can be gleaned froiigi internal evidence. As to the date, the allusion to the Jkabi. on p. 26 proves that the New History was written subsequently to that work, which was composed in A.D.,18582; the allusion to BehAVIIAWs " Manifestation " on p. 64 carries the date down to A.D. 1866; while the reference to the ShAh's tour in Europe (presumably the first) on p. 181 brings it down to A.D. 1873. This last date would in any case be the earliest admissible, for on p. 174 the BàbÕs are said to have endured nearly thirty years of persecution, while on 1 For further details as to the peculiar features of this latter history, see the Introduction to vol. ii of the Traveller's Narrative, pp. xlv-xlvi. 2 See J. R. A. S. for 1892, p. 305. INTRODUCTION. xxxiii p. 321 this number is raised to thirty-five byh one manu-7 script. As to the internal evidences of authorship, they are somewhat conflicting and misleading. In some pas- sages the author implies that he is a Christian (p. 3), -an European (p. 17) and not a Persian (p. 23), and a French- man (p. 318). Certain expressions on pp. 2-3 would suggest that he was a believer in the BàbÕ religion; certain others on p. 30 would seem to imply that he was only a sympathetic onlooker; while the verse cited on p. 17 would lead us to suppose that he was a free-thinker. Several passages (e.g. on pp. 323, 324, and 326) indicate familiarity with Zoroastrian ideas and writings; others (e.g. on pp. 6-7, and 308-9) show a strange ignorance of the history and customs of Europe with which-he professes to be so familiar. Lastly, there are several passages and episodes (some of them occurring in one manuscript only) which have evidently been added to the original work by other hands; e.g. the paragraph on p. 48 beginning, "The reviser of this history says. . ."; the rationalistic remarks on p. 89 by "the writer (or transcriber) of these pages"; and the narratives of the second Nfrfz war (pp. 128-131) and the ZanjAii siege (pp. 139-168) attributed respectively to Nabil and Zabfh. Fortanately-we have, something better than internal evidence to go upon. Thanks to Lieutenant Toumansky of the Russian Artillery, to whose energetic and successful researches amongst the BàbÕs of 'IslikdbAd science owes so much, a full account of the circumstances whichgave rise to the composition of the New History, and gthe manner in which its composition was effected, has beeir obtained from one of the -three persons (the only one still living) concerned therein, to wit,, MirzA AbU"I-Fazl Muhammad ibn Muhammad RizA of GulpAyagAn, whose acquaintance M. Toumansky made at 'IshkAbAd. The xxxiv INTRODUCTION. ,substance of what M. Toumansky learned from Mfrzi Abfi'I-Fazl he most kindly communicated to me through Baron Rosen, with full permission to make use of it. Of this permission I availed myself in describing my manuscript of the Trtri'kh-i-Jadid in my Catalogue and Description of 27 Baibi'MSS. published in the July and October numbers of the J. R. A. S. for 1892, where, at pp. 442-3, Baron Roseii'as words will be found cited. A little while before the conclusion of my Catalogue went to press, I received certain books and letters (Cat. and Des., pp. 663-5 ' , and 701 et seq.) from a Persian Jew of Mash-had named AkA 'Azfzu'llAli, a BàbÕ, and a friend of MirzA Abu"I-Fazi. In answering one of his letters I asked several questions, one of which referred to the com- position of the TrtrW-i-Jadi'd. He promised to refer this question to Mirzi Abu"I-Fazl, and there for the time the matter dropped. It now appears, however, that my questions were duly transmitted to Mfrzi AbA'I-Fazl, who thereupon composed in reply to them a treatise which lie entitled Rist'W'li- likandariyya (" the Epistle of Alexander") in lionour of M. Alexander Touniansky, to whom, in virtue of a long- standing friendship, the book was dedicated. Of this treatise, as he himself says, he wrote four copies with his own hand: one for transmission to Acre, one for M. Toumansky, one for himself, and one for me. The last was sent to Bombay to be thence forwarded to me, but has not yet reached me. This, however, is of the less consequence inasmuch as M. Toumansky is publishing an account of thip important treatise at pp. 33-45 of the forthcoming (eighth) volume of the Zopisski of the Oriental Section of the Imperial Russian Archaeological Society. Of this article Baron Rosen, with his usual kindness, has sent me the proofas, from which I shall now tradaslate what MÕrzà INTRODUCTION. xxxv 0 nd authorship of Abfi'l-Faz says about the comp sition a' the Tdri'kh-i-Jadi'd. The copy of the treatise in question forwarded to M. Toumansky bears the following inscription: "TIM Epistle of Alexander was compiled and composed as a gift to His .116st flonottrable -Excelle2icy Mirza' Alexander Toumansky (may God Almighty prolong the days of his glory and his fortune P). " The cause of its compilation is thus stated:- " The immediate cause of the composition of this his- torical pamphlet was as follows. When I was in HamadAn in the yearA.H. 1305 (A.D. 1887-8), 1 wrote, at the request of certain elders of the Jews, a treatise entitled Risdhr-i- Ayy7ibiyya1 ('The, Epistle of Job'), copies of which were disseminated everywhere. Some while ago, when Ak4 'Azfzu'll;ih was in Bombay, a copy of this treatise fell into the hands of Mr Browne, who wrote to .44 'Azizu'llih, saying, 'Since you are in correspondence with MÕrzà_Abfi'l- Fazi, ask of him three questions. Firstly, in this treatise he has fixed the date of the second restoration of the Holy Temple at four hundred and thirty years, whereas other chronologists have stated it to be about six hundred years'. Secondly, let him make known the chronological data which he possesses touching the life of His Holiness Behi'- r 1 Zapisski,'loc. cit., p. 33, n. 1. 2 This is tb e work described on pp. 701--- 5 of the J. R. A. S. for 1892 under the title IstidIdliyyd 3 The objection which I raised to MÕrzà Abu'l-Fazl's chrono- logy is neither very clearly nor very accurately stated here. His contention was that the 2300 days (ie. years) during which the sanctuary shall be trodden under foot, as mentioned in the book of Daniel (ch. viii, v. 14), came to an end at the time of Behi'- li'llah's "Manifestation" in A.H. 1285 (A.D. 1868), and the question raised bore reference to the terminus a quo. I xxxvi INTRODUCTION. u'llili (may the life of all the delliZeIIS Of the world be his sacrifice!); for the date wliiQli lie asasigiis in his treatise to the Blessed Theophany is A.H. 1285, whereas in the Traveller's Ncirrative it is given as A.H. 12691. Tkirdly, who is the author of the T6rgrkli-i-Jadid ("New History"), for some ascribe it to Mirzi Ab-h'I-Fazl, others to MAnakjf?' In short, it became necessary to compose in reply to him this treatise, which consists for the most part of such facts connected with the Blessed Theophany from first to last as have come within my own knowledge. Now al- though this treatise is addressed to AkA 'Azfzu'llAh, and was written in consequence of the enquiries of Mr Browne, yet was it primarily composed in accordance with a promise which I made to M. Toumansky when I was present with him, and therefore is it named after his name. And the cause of this delay was that, in the absence of an assistant, I was obliged to write four copies with my own hand ; one for transmission to the Supreme Horizon'; one for transmission to Bombay, that it might thence be forwarded to Mr Browne; and one for M. Toumansky; while one must needs remain in my possession. The text of the reply to the third question (touching the authorship of the Trtrikh-i-Jadi'd) is given in full by M. Toumansky (loc. cit., pp. 36-8); and, before proceeding to translate it, it only remains to observe that the tran- scription of his manuscript by MirzA AbA'I-Fazl was con- eluded on the 11th of JumAdA 11, A.H. 1310 (=Dec. 31st, A.D. 1892)- I See Traveller's Narrative, vol. i, pp. 71 and 80-81 ; vol. ii, P. 55 and n. 3, and p. 63. See also the J. R. A. S. for 1892, p. 703, D. 1. 2 ie. to Behi'u'llah at Acre. I INTRODUCTION. 11 T14rd Question. xxxvii " Enquiry was made touching the author of the Tdrtkh-i- Jadid (New History). The writer and author of the Tdrikh-i-Jadi'd was the late MÕrzà Huseyn of HamadAn. He was -a youth of the kinsfolk of Riz6 Khdn the son of Muhammad KhAn the Turcoman, who is reckoned amongst the martyrs of the Castle of Sheykh Tabarsf, and whose name is recorded in the T(irikh-i-JadU . The aforesaid author, in consequence of the calligraphic and epistolary skill which he shewed in drafting letters, was at first secretary to one of the ministers of the Persian Govern- ment. At the time of His Majesty Nisiru'd- Dfn Shdh's first journey to Europe he too visited those countries in the Royal Suite. On his homeward journey lie remained for some time at Constantinople. After his return to Persia, he was amongst those imprisoned in consequence of the troubles of,the year A.H. 1291 (A.D. 1874), when His Reverence AkA JemAl of Burujird was committed to the prison of His Majesty the King after his dispute with the clergy of Tellerin'. " After his release from the prison of Teherin, he ob- tained employment in the office of MAnakjf the Zoroaastriail, well known as an author and writer'. Mdiiakjf treated I See pp. 96-101, and 365 iTVra. 2 A full account of this discussion will be found at pp. 170- 180 infra. This account, as appears from 1). 172, last paragraph, was originally written by -W Jemil himself in Arabic, and trans- lated by MÕrzà Abd'l Fazl of GulpAyagin into Persian. The conjecture which I hazarded in n. I on p. 170 as to the identity of " the Letter J " proves to be correct. 3 The full name of Minakjf, late Zoroa8trian Agent at TeherAD, was Minakji' the son of Lfmjf H~ishang Hftaryirf Kiy6nf, sur- named Darvish-i-Fdni (a)~!Jkjb 'a. &U L;!-j._9jJJ Tbusitisgiven by himself in N. If. d I Xx Vill Sith great respect, for had he not become notorious him as a BàbÕ, he would never have engaged in this work. Now it chanced one night that he and Muhammad Isma'fl KhAn the Zend, who was a writer skilful in Persian composition, were MAnakjf's guests at supper ; and MAnakjf requested each one of them to write a book (for be was most zealous in book-collecting, and whomsoever he deemed capable of writing and composing lie would urge to write a book or compose a treatise). So on this night he requested Muhammad Isma'fl Khdn to write a history of the kings of Persia, and begged MÕrzà Huseyn to compile a history of the BàbÕs. " To be brief, Muhammad Isma'fl KhAn wrote the book called _Viraizisfifn, on the ancient empire of Persia from Mah-AbAd till the fall bf the SAsAnians, in pure Persian, which, as a matter of fact, he made a veritable ragbag of legends and myths from the Slia'hwilma, the Cliah(tr Chiman, and the Dasaitt'r. But Mimi Huseyn came to the writer and asked his assistance, saying, 'Since hitherto no full and correct history has been written treating Of the events of this Theopliany, to collect and compile the INTRODUCTION. the preface which he wrote to the Farh ang-i-Anjuman-dr(t-yi Mtsiri of RizA-Kulf KhAn Ld1dt-bdshi,, and at the beginning of the Persian translation of theaccount of his travels in Persia published under the title ;tVJ61 -dJL~; at Bombay in A.H. 1280 (A.D. 1863). He appears to have come to Persia from India in 1854, for the German missionaries Petermann and Briffil travelled with him, his son Ormazdjf, a Mulbad or Zoroas- trian priest, a secretary named Key Khusraw, and a cook named ShApArjf, from Shfriz to Yezd in July of that year. (See an article by F. Justi on the dialect of Yezd in the Z. A M. G. for 1881, vol. xxv, pp. 327-8, and a foot-note on p. 328, according to which MAnakjf acted for a while as French consul at Yezd.) He died a year or two ago. INTRODUCTION. xxxix various episodes thereof in a fitting manner is a very difficult matter. For what Sipihr and Hiddyatl have written touching its circumstances is, by reason of their extreme, obsequiousness and their utter error, altogether sheer calumny and downright falsehood. And the accounts given by narrators, too, are so diverse and different that the reconciliation of them is not free from difficulty-' " To this I replied, 'There is in the hands of the Friends a history by the late HAjf Mfrz;A Jilif of KishAn, who was one of the martyrs of TeherAn, and one of the best men of that time. But be was a man engaged in business and without skill in historiography, neither-did he record the dates of the years and months. At most he, being a God- fearilig man, truthfully set down the record of events as he had seen and heard them. Obtain this book, and take the episodes from it, and the dates of the years and months from the Ndsikhu't-Tawairikh and the appendices of the Rawzatu's_A~af(t,; and, having incorporated these in your rough draft, read over each sheet to His Reverence Hijf Seyyid JawAd of KerbelA (whose name has been repeatedly mentioned in these pages), for he, from the beginning of the Manifestation of the First Point [i.e. the Balb] until the arrival of His Holiness Behi'ullAh in Acre, accompanied the Friends everywhere in person, and is thoroughly informed and cognizant of all events. Thus diligently correct the history, in order that this book may, by the will of God, be well finished, and may win the approbation of the learned throughout the world.' "Then he requested the writer to indite the introduc 1 Concerning Sipihr (better known as Lisdme-1-3fulk) and Hiddyat (Rizi-Kulf KhAn Ldld-bashi), and their histories, the Ndsikhu't- Tawdrikh and the supplement to the Rawzatzes- Safei, see Vol. ii of my Traveller's.Yarrative, pp. 173- 192. d 2 X1 INTRODUCTION. tory preface, and so open for him the path of composition. So 1, agreeably to his request, wrote two pages at the ginning of that book, and embellished this introduction th prefatory exhortations a ' nd incitements to strive after truth'. Now it was his intention to compose this book in two VoluMeS2, the first volume about the events con- nected with the Manifestation of the First Point [i.e. the BAb], and the second volume about the circumstances of the Most Holy and Most Splendid Dawn'. But after he had completed the first volume, fate granted him no further respite, for lie died in the city of Resht in the year A. H. 1299 [= A.D. 1881-2]. " But MAnakjf would not suffer this history to be finished in the manner which the writer had suggested, but compelled the chronicler to write what lie dictated. For MAnakJVs custom was ti) bid his secretary write down some matter and afterwards read the rough draft over to him. So first of all the secretary used to read over to him the rough draft which lie had made in accordance with his own taste and agreeably to the canons of good style; and then, after Mdiiakjf had made additions here and excisions there, and had docked and re-arranged the matter, he used to make a fair copy. And since MAnakif had no great skill or science in the Persian tongue, the style of most of the books and treatises attributed to him is discolginected and broken, good and bad being mingled together. In addition to this defect, ignorant scribes and 1 Cf. .1. R. A. S. for 1892, p. 442. According to Baron Rosen's letter there cited, the portion of the Preface of the New History composed by Mfrza' AbA'I-Fazl extends from the beginning to 1. 3 of p. 3 infra. 2 See pp. 318-319 infra. ession (,.~l 3 By this expr 4JJo) the Manifestation of Bebi)_~IlAh is meant. i INTRODUCTION. illiterate -writers have, in accordance with their own fancies, so altered the Tiriklk-i-Jadid' that at the present day every copy of it appears like a defaced portrait or a restored temple, to such a degree that one cannot obtain a correct copy of it, unless it were the author's own transcript; other- wise no copy can be relied upon. " As for Hiji MÕrzà JAni of KAshAn, he was ODe Of the most highly respected merchants of that town, and believed in the blessed mission of the First Point [i.e. the BAbJ at the very beginning of the Theophany. He was brother to Jewltb-i-Zab~k (who is mentioned in the Lawk-i-Ra't's', and was honoured with the title of Ant's). He it was who, when the First Point (exalted be his Supreme Name 1) was being conveyed, by command of Muhammad ShAh, from lsfahd,n to TeherAn, entertained His Holiness for three nights in his house at KAshdn'. Some while afterwards he came froin KishAn to TeherAn, and abode in ShAh 'Abdu'l- 'AzfM4, where he wrote his history. He was involved in the catastrophe of the year A.H. 1268 (A.D. 1852, Aug.- Sept.), and in prison shared the same cell with His Holiness Belid'u'llih, and was bound by the same iron chain. Some days later 'he was put to death, an innocent victim, in this massacre5, and attained to the rank of martyrdom. 1 The multitude of variants and divergences in the two MSS. of which I made use in preparing this translation fully bears out this statement. 2 See indei., s.v. Zabih - and the J. R. A. S. for 1892, p. 311, where my conjecture as to the identity of Zabih seems to have been erroneous. 3 See pp. 213-214, and 349 infra. 4 The celebrated shrine and city of refuge, distant about 5 or 6 miles from Teherin to the south. 5 On September 15th, A.D. 1852. See Traveller's Narrative, vol. ii, p. 332. x1ii INTRODUCTION. But of his history 1, the writer, cannot now procure a copy; for from Samarkand to Teherin is very far, and fortune frowns on the People of BehA, and is beyond measure jealous of them. " God Alm lity best knoweth the truth of all matters. " Written tin the twenty-first day of the month of' Rabru'th-thainf A.H. 1310, corresponding to the thirty-first of Tashrin-i-avval [October]' A.I). 1892, by the pen of the author of this treatise, Abft'I-Fazl Muhammad ibn Mu- hammad 1146 of GulpAyagin." This full and detailed account of the authorship and composition of the T6rikh-i-Jadt'd, for which both Mfrz6 AbA'I-Fazl and M. Toumansky are entitled to our warmest gratitude-, the one for writing and the other for publishing it, renders it unnecessary for me to say much more on this head. We cannot but regret that one capable of writing so clear, succinct, and pertinent a statement had not a larger share in the compilation of the Rig-rkh-i-Jadid ' which would undoubtedly have gained much more from the co-operation of MÕrzà Abu'l-Fazl than it has from that of MAnakjf. One point, however, I must again briefly allude to : I mean the share iing the work here ascribed to Seyyid JawAd of Kerbeli. In my Catalogue and Descrip- tion of 27 Bdb11'H8S. (J. R. A. S. for 1892, pp. 443-4 and 683-5) 1 expressed a doubt as to the correctness of this- portion of MÕrzà Abu"I-Fazl's statement, my grounds for this doubt being the ascription to Seyyid JawAd of the Hasht Kihisht, a controversial work of strongly-marked Ezelf proclivities, and assurances given to me by ~ubl ' i-i-Ezel to the effect that Seyyid JawAd was one of his staunchest This date is given according to the old style prevalent in Russia. The corresponding date according to our style ias No- vember 12th. INTRODUCTION. xliii - adherents'. What I wrote on this matter was shown by M. Toumansky to MÕrzà Abft'l-Fazl, who, in letters pub- lished in the article in the Zapisski already cited, cate- gorically and absolutely denies that Seyyid JawAd was an Ezelf, or was other than a most devoted and loyal adherent of BehA. I have not space to quote either the interesting biographical details about this illustrious man, nor the epistle addressed to him by BehA'u'lldh, nor the denial of his sympathy with the Ezelfs made by Mirzi Ab,h'I-Fazl to M. Toumansky, and published by the latter in Vol. viii of the Zapisski (pp. 41, ahnd 43-5), to which I refer such as desire fuller information. The sum of the matter is this: Seyyid JawAd was a man equally re- markable for his illustrious descent, his learning, and his piety; he was brought up in the Sheykhf doctrines, followed the lectures of Seyyid KAzim, and was one of the earliest believers in the BAb, whom he knew personally. His nature was so gentle and temperate that, according to MÕrzà AbiYI-Fazl, 11 he would speak ill of no one, mentioning all religious opinions, whether of Hindoos, Jews, Christians, MusulmAns, Ezelfs, or BehA'fs, with respect." BoththeEzelfs and the BehA'fs claim him; and, as I think, we have not yet sufficient evidence to enable us to decide between them, for against the clear and explicit testimony of Mfrz& AhA'l-Fazl is the equally clear and equally explicit testi- mony of Subh-i-Ezel and his partisan Sheykh A -. I now pass to my own connection with the Tdrikh-i- Jadi'd. I was first made aware of its existence by Mr Sidney Churchill (to whose unrivalled knowledge of Persian biblio- graphy I seize this occasion of once more bearing testimony) on December 14th, 1887. He told me that he had obtained a manuscript of this history of the BàbÕs for the British I Traveller8 Narrative, Vol. ii, p. 342, n. 2. Xliv INTRODUCTION. INTRODUCTION. xlV Museum Library, and advised me, if I was interested in this subject, to work at it on my return to England. H e, did not inform me of the author's name, but said that he was a member of the sect. I made a note of his communi- cation in my diary, and, for the time being, did nothing more. I next heard of the TdrWi-i-Jadid at SlifrAz on March 30th, 1888, from some of my BA]f friends. They described it as a history of the events of1the 'Manifestation' from the beginning, and the author as a Persian who had travelled much, and who, having begun to write the book as an impartial observer, had been convinced by the results of his enquiries, if not by his own eloquence, during the progress of his labours. One of my informants, a BàbÕ missionary, admitted that he knew the name of the author, but said that lie did not feel justified in divulging it to me. At the asaiigie time a promise w . as given that a copy of the book should be lent-to me. This promise was fulfilled two days later; and during my stay at ShfrAz I read a considerable portion of it. When I left ShfrAz hurriedly for Yezd, expecting to return thither before leaving Persia, I was permitted to take the manuscript with me, and finally it was bestowed upon me as a gift. It is now in my possession, and is described in full in my Catalogue a2id Description of 27 Bdbi' 0188. (J. R. A. for 1892, pp. 440-444) under the press-mark BBP. 5. In this volume I designate it simply as C. (Cambridge Codex). On my return to England in the autumn of 1888, 1 again read this manuscript through, this time more care- fully, making marginal references and annotations ; and I made considerable use of it in the compilation of the two articles on the BàbÕs which I published in the July and October n'Liinbers of the .1. -B. A. S. for 1889. This reading I concluded on December 8th, 1888. When the conclusion of the two articles above referred- to left me free to take up fresh work, I resolved to prepare a text and translation of the T6rikh-i-Jadid. I did not at first make any use of the British Museum Codex (Or. 2942), as I could not at that time go to London to consult it. I therefore transcribed my manuscript in a fair legible hand, such as could be easily read by an European com- positor, marking the passages which seemed corrupt, or writing them in pencil with a query in the margin, and sometimes a conjectural emendation. At the same time I made the rough draft of a literal English translation, which, however, I discontinued when I had transcribed about half the book. The transcript I finished on February 8th, 1890. During the following Easter Vacation (March 4tb- May 3rd) I visited the two rival BàbÕ chiefs, Subh-i-Ezel at Famagusta in Cyprus, and BehA'u'llAh at Acre in Syria. From the latter place I brought back the -manuscript of 'AbbAs Efendi's Traveller's Narrative (referred to at pp. xiv and xxxi-ii slTra), which, in accordance with the pleasure of the Syndics of the University Press, I published in f ae_Sifijile a with an English translation and notes. Till the appearance of these volumes in February 1892, 1 had little leisure to give to the T6rrkh-i-Jad-rd, but nevertheless in the Easter vacation of 1891 1 spent about three weeks in London, and, by dint of hard work, finished collating my transcript of the text with the British Museum Codex (Or. 2942), hereinafter designated as L. (London Codex), on April 11th of that year. This collation was more laborious than I had anticipated, for the variants between the two manuscripts were numerous and important, and several long episodes contained in L. but omitted in C. had to be transcribed. Finally, however, the work was accomplished, and a satisfactory text established. p xlvi INTRODUCTION, INTRODUCTION. x1vii aid, to publish My original intention was, as T have s, to bear the expenses of publishing the translation, but both text and translation of a work which I regarded as of i expressed a disinclination to undertake the text as well. capital importance for the proper understanding of the BàbÕ religion. It was clear, however, that the partial This decision, although it did not surprise me, caused me translation which I had made would have to be entirely at the time some little disappointment; for it is not in rewritten in the fuller light of the collated and corrected human nature, when one has laboured long and diligently text. The work of translating the Traveller's Narrative at the reconstruction of a text, to learn without a shadow had somewhat modified my views as to the manner in of regret that it will never be anything more than a manu- which Eastern bookai should be done into English. I had script. Yet I deem it now a most fortunate circumstance made that translation as literal is possible, and, owing that the Syndics arrived at this decision, for the discovery of H&jf MfrJA JAnf's history in the Biblioth'que Nationak to the concise and clear style of the original, this was not so difficult as in the case of the diffuse, wordy and dis- puts an entirely new complexion on the matter, and it is evident that it has a far stronger claim to publication than cursive New History, which abounded in re-iterations, the T&z'kk-i-Jadzd. digressions, and irrelevant diatribes. Yet even the trans- The -determination arrived at by the Syndics decided lation which I had made of the Traveller's Narrative did not wholly satisfy me, for I felt that, notwithstanding all me on two points. I had learned from Baron Rosen that an incomplete manuscript of the TdrWW-Jadt'd had been my pains, it was at best laborious and wearisome reading obtained at 'IshkAbad and forwarded to St Petersburg by in English. How, then, would- it be with the New Lieutenant Touinansky in the summer or autumn of 1890'. History ? Had it been decided to publish the text, I should- have Before finally decidin on the course which I should 9 had to make a further collation of this manuscript with adopt, I again applied to the Syndics of the University my restored text. As the translation only was to be pub- Press with a view to ascertaining whether they were lished, this'seemed to me no longer absolutely necessary, disposed to accept the text and translation of the book, my text being sufficiently good for this purpose. I was, or either of them, for publication. I ventured to urge the ignoreover, enabled to form a clearer conception of the lines publication- of the translation, but did not feel justified in on which my new translation must be made. Of the plan insisting very strongly on the importance of printing the which I elaborated and have carried out in the following text as well ; for to print so extensive a text in the Arabic pages I shall now proceed to speak. character would, I knew, be a very costly undertaking, The facts with which I had to reckon were these : a and, seeing that of such texts the total number which work wherein historical matter of great interest and im- can be published in Europe is necessarily limited, it portance was mingled with prolix digressions of little value; is incumbent on the scholar to consider what text is a text based on two manuscripts each of which contained most indispensable, lest haply lie fail to use to the I See Collections Scientifiques de Unstitut de8 Langues Orien- best advantage the facilities placed at his disposal. In reply to my application, the Syndics enerously consented tales de St Pe'tersbo urg, Vol. vi, p. 244 and the J. R. A. S. for 9 1892, pp. 318-'319. I x1viii INTRODUCTION. INTRODUCTION. xlix several important and lengthy passages omitted in the being actually introduced by the words "thus says ~ the other; and a style generally concise and clear in the reviser of this history," or "thus says the transcriber'." narrative portions of the book, but florid, redundant, and It was evidently most important to preserve all these diffuse in the digressions, The object which I had in view narratives, to indicate at the saine time the Codex in was to produce a readable rendering of this work in English, which they occurred, and, in the case of episodes differently which, while embodying everything in the least degree narrated in the two Codices, to give the two versions for calculated to throw lialit on the history and development comparison one beside the other. of the Bibf religion, a,31iould oiiiit most of the irrelevant The way in which I have done this is as follows. Pas- matter mixed up with it in the original, preserving only sages occurring only in L. (the London Codex) are enclosed such specimens of the digressions, diatribes, and somewhat in single square brackets and passages occurring trite reflections of the author as might suffice to give a only in C. (the Cambridge Codex, i.e. my own MS.) in correct idea of his style. double brackets When such passage is a simple Now in the case of a classical or ancient text, which insertion, and, has nothing corresponding with it in the has an interest mainly literary, our endeavour must evi- other manuscript, no further mark is added. , When, how- here is a parallel passage in the other manuscript dently be to find out, so far as possible, what the author ever, t wrote, and to eliminate and discard all interpolations made (whether this consist of a few words only, or of a different by later hands. No one, for instance, who proposed to narrative of almost equal length), the two versions are edit the Jlasnavl' would wish to retain in the text the placed one above the other (the longer, as a rule, in the many spuriotia-, lines which have been added by iiigeniouas body of the page, the shorter at the foot), and the same copyists in the course of ages; therefore, having satisfied typographical mark (an asterisk, a dagger, or the like) is himself that a given passage reposed on no good manu- placed outside the enclosing brackets of both, so that their script authority, lie would without compunction excise correspondence may be at once apparent. In this way it. But this does not apply to a book like the T6r~kh-i- both versions are preserved, and the translation of either Jadid, which was written only thirteen or fourteen years ago) -which is essentially a cOngipilati0ii made by two or As instances I will only cite K~ichak 'Ali Beg's-narrative of the entry of the Nfrfz captives into ShfrAz (pp. 124-8 infra), three persons acting in coihicert, and which, moreover, ia3 which is much fuller in L. than in C.; the different accounts of interesting less from a literary than from a historical point the second Nfrfz insurrection in the two MSS. (pp. 128-131) ; of view. In this case the interpolations may be just as the extensive particulars of the ZanjAn siege given in L. on the valuable as the original text, for no one but a BàbÕ would copy the book, and such an one might well add from his owl, authority of Haydar Beg, the son of Mulli Muhammad 'Alf's lieutenant Din Muhammad (pp. 136-161, and 163-8); ~,abfh's knowledge new and important facts of which the autlioras narrative of Mir 'Abdu'l-BAkf's meeting with the BAb at K6shAn were not cognizant. Indeed, as a matter of fact, some of (pp. 214--216) in L.; the text of MÕrzà Muhammad 'Ali's letter the most interesting portions of the Tdrikh-i-Jadrd are to his brother (pp. 301-3) in C.; and SuleymAn Kh6n's account evidently interpolations of this sort, several of them of the Nib's execution in L. (pp, 309-311). INTRODUCTION. INTRODUCTION. text can be easily restored. Suppose, for example, one of my readers sees reason to think that the L. text is the, more correct one, and wishes to deal with this only, he will delete everything enclosed in double brackets, and transfer the parallel passages in single brackets from. the- foot of the page into the body of the text; and vice versa'. In some cases passages occurring in one manuscript only (but generally passages of small extent) have been rele- gated to the foot of the page because they appeared to me to be either redundant, or incorrect. In this case their position in the text is indicated by the insertion at the point where they occur of the same typographical sign (asterisk, dagger, or the like) which is prefixed and ap- pended to the brackets enclosing them. Of the two manuscripts oil which my text is based, the London Codex (L.) is described at pp. 192-7 of vol. ii of my Traveller's Narrative, and my own manuscript (C.) at pp. 440-4 of the J.R.A.S. for 1892, so that I need say no more about them in this place, save that the former, transcribed in Rajab A.H. 1298 (June, 1881), was written, as appears from MÕrzà Abii'l-Fazl's statement, during the author's lifetime (for he died in A.H. 1299), and may even have been made under his supervision. In any case it is the better manuscript of the two. My inability to publish the text has made me feel a greater responsibility about the translation, since my readers will not be able to check the accuracy of my renderings by reference to the original; and I can conscientiously say that I have taken more pains with this book than with the Traveller's Narrative, though I have not followed the idiom of the Persian quite so closely, especially in the noil-historical portions, where I felt that a greater latitude in treatment was admissible. It now only remains for me to speak of the supple- mentary, matter with which I have striven, to enrich this volume, and to tender my thanks to those to whom I am most indebted for help. This supplementary matter con- sists of three illustrations; four fac-similes of letters; and three Appendices', numbered II, III, and IV. Of the illustrations, one, a portrait of Subh-i-Ezel, forms the frontispiece. For this I am indebted to my friend Captain Arthur Young, lately Commissioner at Famagusta in Cyprus, to whose kind help I owe so much. The photograph, which, as I can testify, is an extremely faithful likeness, was taken, so far as I remember, about the end of 1889 or the beginning of 1890, and the negative, which was necessary for the preparation of the copper-plate, was sent to me last year. The plans of Sheykh Tabarsf and the sketch of the ZanjAn gate were drawn by my sister, Miss Helen Browne, from rough sketches made by myself on the spot in 1887-8. For the autograph letters of the Bib, Seyyid Huseyn, MullA Sheykh 'All Jena&i-'Aztm) and Kurratu'l-'Ayn I aign indebted to the kindness of Subh-i-Ezel. Fac-similes of these, with their translations and reproductions in the printed character, form Appendix 111, to which the reader is referred for further information. All these illustrations and fac-similes have been executed by the Cambridge Engravillg Company under the supervision of my friend Mr A. G. Dew-Smith of Trinity College, to whom I here offer my warmest thanks for the pains which he has taken to make them as perfect as possible. For the facilities afforded ine for working at the Paris manuscript of HAjf MÕrzà JAnf's history, an account of which forms Appendix II of this volume, I owe a great I Appendix I is not included, because it merely contains an abstract of certain portions of the Tdrikh-i-Jadid which did not seem to me worth translating in full. iii INTRODUCTION. debt of gratitude to the ,Liitlioritica3 of the Biblioth6que Nationale, especially to M. Delisle and M. Zotenberg, as well as to my friends M. Barbier de Meynard and M. Michel Br6al. For the transcript of the text on which 1 have chiefly had to rely, my thanks are due to Ahmed Beg Agaeff, who, at considerable personal inconvenience, exerted himself to the utmost to complete it in the shortest possible space of time. The "Succinct Account qf the B(ibll' Jfovement," of which the English translation forms Appendix IV of this volume, and of which the Persian text stands at the end of the book after the Index, was written for me by ~ubh-i- Ezel in November--December 1889 in reply to sundry questions which I had addressed to hini a little while pre- viously. On the importance of such an account coming from such a source it is unnecessary to dwell : it is almost as though we had a narrative of the first beginnings of Islim told by 'Ali ibn Abf Talib. That so valuable a document deserved publication will, I should think, be questioned by no one. Last of all my warmest thanks are due to the Syndics of the University Press for their liberality in bearing the cost of publication of a work little likely, I fear, to prove remunerative; to my friend Mr R. A. Neil of this College for undertaking, notwithstan ding the many claii-nas on his time, the labour of reading through the proof-sheets; and to Baron Rosen and Lieutenant Toumansky for keeping me continually informed of their latest discoveries, and for supplying me with proofs of papers not yet published. That my book may not be found unworthy of the generous help received from so many different quarters is my earnest hope. I I I I THE TARIKH-I-JADID, OR NEW HISTORY OF I MIRZA 'ALf MUIJAMMAD THE BA'B. N. H. I I PREFACE. THAT in matters of faith and g religion a slavish sub.- servience to authority and custom is improper and unseemly; that problems of such vital importance cannot be solved by passion, prejudice, and idle guesses ; and that we canihiot soar into a region so vast on the wings of baseless'con-, jecture or blind conformity, are statements which allwise and impartial judges will readily admit. For it -was through naught else than such blind -imitation of --their ancestors and unreasoning submission. to the. authority -of their priests that former peoples rejected the prophets, sent unto them, seeking to justify their unbelief by such words as, "Verily we found our fathers practising a religion, and we follow their footsteps'." Neither is this enquiry one on which we should enter heedlessly or unreflectingly,, inasmuch as even those best qualified to undertake it do humbly entreat Him who is the Guide of Wanderers to keep them from erring or stumbling, while the, very pro- phets and apostles exclaim in their sense of utter helpless-g ness, " Place me not with the g wicked people One cannot, therefore, in a quest so perilous, follow the foot- steps of such as pretend to take philosophy as a guide of life while they are themselves still entangled in the bonds of passion; nor of those who acquire learning only with A 1 Kur'àn, x1iii, 22. 2 Kur'àn, vii, 149. 1 PREFACE. 3 2 THE NEW HISTORY. I view to obtaining power, and who make their austere and enquiry to his fellow-men, that they also may be delivered ascetic life a snare wherewith to delude the ignorant. [For from doubt and uncertainty. For this reason did the the Prophet bath said, "All men shall perish save the writer of this book deem it incumbent on himself to set wise, and all the wise shall perish save such as make uase of forth in these pages in a concise and narrative form such their wisdom, and all such as make use of their wisdom information as he acquired during his travels in Persia shall perish save those who are sincere, and even the concerning the different sects of the MusulmAns, hoping sincere are in dire peril." This is also implied in the that thereby certain current misapprehensions may be saying, "The true believer is rarer than the philosopher's dissipated, and that sundry baseless calumnies and false stone, and harder to find than pure gold" ; while the same accusations which lead men to deem their fellow creatures fact is eloquently aset forth by Christ where he, says that infidels meet only to be slain and despoiled, whose very men of every kind shall assemble at the wedding-feast, but touch is a contamination, may be disproved. In this way that the chosen are few.] the enmity and discord which are the ruin of this people But inasmuch as the Merciful God bath made every may perchance be abated, so that they may meet and soul a mirror capable of illumination by the Sun of discuss amicably with a view to the removal of their Wisdom, in such wise that whosoever will inay thereby differences, and may no longer continue to regard each apprehend divine verities, and so become endowed with other as infidels and unbelievers without having clearly true humanity and unselfishness, it behoves every one to apprehended that wherein they are at variance. renounce all self-seeking and egotism, to avert his gaze To be brief, after travelling for some time in all parts -of from passion and desire, and earnestly to endeavour to Europe and India and observing the races and religions of follow the path of God, looking to Him and trusting in those regions, I chanced to visit Persia. Although I had Him. So with stedfast feet shall he pursue the path of not meditated a long sojourn in that country, nevertheless righteousness, and enter with all sincerity and singleness of events so shaped themselves that I remained there for a heart into the highway of enquiry, until lie at length win considerable period, mixing in familiar conversation with to a state where God shall be gracious unto him and shall all sorts of people, and making friends and acquaintances guide him unto the recipient of divine revelation and the amongst every class. Some of these invited me to ex- saint of that age. Thus may the seeker realize the pro- change the Christian faith for the religion of Muhammad; mise of the blessed word, "Those who strive for us we will others regarded me as one of themselves; others again assuredly direct into our ways'." received me not. Yet such was the divergence of opinions Now whosoever bath been brought to this state and led and such the multiplicity of sects which I beheld in this to apprehend this truth is bound by the gratitude which so religion- Sheykhfs, Mutasharri's, SAffs, Sunnfs, mystics, signal a blessing ashould inspire, as well as by the dictates metaphysicians, dervishes, Nuseyris', devotees, and BàbÕs- of common humanity, to communicate the results of his that, though my inclination prompted me to advance, my reason bade me stand still. For if the Kur'-An be one and Kur'a'n, xxix, 69. contain the commands of God, whence come all these 1-2 4 THE NEW HISTORY. differences of opinion and contradictory judgements ? Seek as I might, I could discover no agreement between the treatises of two vmll6s, or the decisions of two muitallids. What I heard was ever, "My humble opinion is this," or "the view held by So-and-so is this," the command of God being altogether disregarded amongst them. Alas that they have by their disagreements and dif- ferences so marred this holy Law that little is left of it save the name and appearance, and that nothing wise or intelligible is any longer heard, but only vain discussions touching legal uncleanness and purification It is as though God, in His infinite bounty, ahould cause to fall the rain of mercy, purposing thereby to satisfy all mankind with sweet streams of wisdom, and to deliver them from the thirst of ignorance and inadvertence; that thereupon a host of foul reptiles should gather round the spot where it had collected pure and sweet, battening, breeding, and each after his own fashion asserting his supremacy and claiming undisputed possession ; that in the course of ages these should so befoul and pollute that pure sweet water that it waxeth loathsome and abominable; that notwith- standing this they should still continue with those melodious voices wherewith they are endowed to invite all inen from far and near to enter in and drink, crying out "This is the pure Water of Life and the Fount of Immortality " ; that pilgrims athirst in the desert of enquiry should approach with eager hope ; but that on their arrival they should behold the contrary of what they had expected, and should turn away in bitter disappointment, saying, If indeed the faith of IslAni be what in the world appears, Well may sceptics mock the faith of Islaim with a thousand sneers ! " And yet, by striving to exercise a little candour and to banish dissension, they might still hope to purify and PREFACE. reform this holy religion. But if they desire to please God and His prophets, regenerate their faith, restore to their creed its pristine lustre, and render their country and state once more free, prosperous, and powerful, they must in the first place abandon certain habits which are at present rooted and engrained in their very nature. To these habits they have grown so accustomed that not only have they become almost a second nature, but the hatefulness thereof is not even suspected by them. Their condition is like that of a certain priest who said to a friend, " If you notice in me any objectionable habit of which I myself may not be aware, pray inform me of it, that I may strive to relinquish it." " I perceive no fault in you," answered his friend, "save a habit of using abusive language." "Abusive language!" cried the other, " What rascally knave calls me abusive? What shameless ruffian have I abused that he should dare to prefer such a charge against me?" Now the principal vice of the Persians (and it is the worst of faults, and, indeed, the source of all) is falsehood, which has gained such universal ascendancy and become so customary and so familiar that truthfulness and integrity are entir6ly abandoned and ignored. And it is this vice which has brought about the decay of religion and law and the enfeeblement of Church and State. For falsehoods uttered by ministers of state in diplomatic transactions by destroying the dignity of the Crown and the reputation of the government, bring about the ruin of the empire ; falsehoods proceeding from ministers of religion dishonour the Sacred Law and overthrow the edifice of faith; while falsehoods uttered by the common folk prevent progress and tend to bring about the decline and fall of the nation. For this reason political and religious liberty and national wealth and prosperity are in all other countries and amongst all other races and creeds, whether in Europe or India, 6 THE NEW HISTORY. daily on the increase ; while with this unfortunate people, by reason of this same perverse untruthfulness and lack of integrity, they are continually on the decline, though the prevalent corruption, disorder, and mental preoccupation do not suffer the cause of this to be discerned. The people of Italy were till within recent years similarly afflicted. Eventually a number of their men of learning assembled together to investigate the cause of this. "Since we dwell in the fairest portion of Europe," said they, "and are skilled in all arts, trades, manufactures, and sciences, what can be the reason that we are continually deteriorating while our neighbours are perpetually making progress in every direction ? " After due thought and deliberation they discovered that this was wholly traceable to the influence of the Pope, who in their country represented the supreme spiritual authority, declaring himself to be the vicar of Christ. He, like the divines of Persia, withheld men from acquiring iia-,efiil arts and accomplishments or amassing wealth by senseless injurictions, in proof of which lie would adduce sayings of great and holy men whereof he had wholly failed to apprehend the true purport, sue as, " The world is carrion and such aas desire it are dogs" " Love of the world is the source of all error "; " Provision is appointed and the covetous are disappointed." These aphorisms, and others like unto them, had been so dinned into men's ears that they had ceased to care for art, commerce, agriculture, or wealth, and had been brought to regard this ancient and enduring world as a thing im- permanent and unstable as a spider's web, saying, for example,- "Naught in tb e world shall endure ; Naught shall abide 'neath the sun; Earth is a mansion as frail As the web which the spider hath spun." I PREFACE. 7 Yet in this " spider's web " the wise men of , Europe, by means of the astronomical instruments and tables which they possess, behold one of those celestial orbs whereof some are so remote that the light proceeding from them must travel for thirty thousand years ere it reach this globe, notwithstanding that light travels two hundred thousand miles a second! We speak here of orbs which the wise men of those parts have actually beheld with the eye of sense, for as to those far more distant orbs which cannot be seen without special appliances, but which still exercise attraction on other celestial bodies, they extend unto wheresoever God pleaseth, and He alone knoweth their number, the distances which intervene between them, the fashion of their formation, and the kind of creatures which inhabit them. Compared to these this globe is like a ball encircled by the bat of Divine Might, and so moved and rolled by the sun's attraction. To be brief, however, when the wise men of Europe and the people of Italy had proved the extent of His Holiness the Pope's hypocrisy, guile, and deceit, they exerted all their energies, and, notwithstanding all his power and the subjection in which he had hitherto held all the sovereigns of Europe, so effectually deposed him and his children and grandchildren that naught remained of him but the name and appearance, nor did anyone thenceforth pay the slightest heed to a single word which he wrote. After this they employed themselves in spreading the triumphs of Art, Commerce, and Political Reform, until in a little while they became objects of emulation to all their fellows and contemporaries. Now, although the Persians have witnessed and com- prehended the consequences of falsehood, they still refuse to relinquish this evil habit- I know not how such as in evil delight See nothing but evil in virtue and right." 8 THE NEW HISTORY. Yet in their books of tradition it is stated on good authority that certain persons demanded of the ImAin Ja'far-i-SAdik, "Will your followers commit crimes and do unlawful actions?" He answered, "Yes." "Will they be guilty of fornication alid sins against nature?~' they asked. "It is possible," lie replied. "Will they drink wine and do murder?" they inquired. , it is likely enough," said he. " Will they utter falsehoods ?" they asked. " That," said lie, "is impossible! " Notwithstanding this, the Persians astill claim to be Shi'ites, and, although God has called liars accursed in all the sacred books, refuse to abandon their mendacious habits. Nor do they confine themselves to minor false- hoods affecting only the things of this world, for in matters relating to religion also they have shewn them- selves to be ready liars and shameless -forgers, as will be duly set forth in its proper place. Now the principal evil of falsehood is, that when it has entered- into a man's nature -aii(hl there established itself, it generates a host of other evils. Amongst these is hypocrisy, which is a kind of unbelief. Hypocrites have ever been the chief cause of the downfall of re- ligion, even as the Seal of the Prophets, Muhammad, hath said, " I fear for this faith neither unbeliever nor believer, but I fear - the hypocrite who makes a show of faith and harbours unbelief in his heart." Now the ori- ginal meaning of the word kit ,fr (unbelief) is the con- cealing of h-uth or right in any way whatsoever, though it be but to the extent of a mustard-seed or mote, without its being restricted to the truth or right of God or man. Indeed it is evident that none can conceal God, who is more evident and manifest than the visible sun. So a k6fir (unbeliever) is one who refuses to recognize the rights of God or of his fellow-men; and this unbelief, as I imagine, exists to some extent in every one. And so i PREFACE. 9 likewise the devout Musulm.An is he who recognizes God and all 'such as have just claims on him, and who dis- charges the duties which he owes to others in a right manner, injuring none either in word or deed. But as for such as devour the wealth of great and small alike, dis- honour their fellow-men, lay violent hands on the property of this one or that one, give unjust decisions, and de- nounce as infidels and doom to death God's servants, I know not how they can hope or believe that they are devout Musulmins! Could some men but regard them- selves impartially and discern their own inward unbelief, they would never again ascribe infidelity to another 1 As it has now been shewn that disregard and neglect of the rights of our fellow-men is a kind of unbelief, it is evident also that hypocrisy is a species of latent infidelity, and Muhammad hath said, Infidelity is more difficult of detection amongst my people than a black ant crawling in the dark night over hard rock." Now hypocrites are those whose hearts and tongues are not in accord, -whose words and deeds are inconsistent, who are inwardly repro-, bate and outwardly devout, and who, clothing themselves in the garb of a spurious asceticism and simulated piety, seek to deceive God and man by their guile and cuniiing- "Without fair-seeming as the pagan's shrine; Wi thin o'ershadowed by the wrath divine; The life of Bdyazfdl their lips defame -, Their hearts Yazfd2 himself might blush to claim." Now should anyone, while admitting that it is possible by guile and falsehood to deceive men, demand how it,is possible to deceive God, we reply that, albeit this is im- 1 BAyazid of Bistim, a celebrated SAff saint who flourished in the third century of the hijra. 2 Yazid b. Muliviya, the second 0mayyad caliph and mur- derer of the Imim Huseyn. He reigned from A.H. 60 to 64. , i 10 THE NEW HISTORY. possible, these foolish itgicii do nevertheless attempt to cheat Him who is " the Bost Deviser of Stratagems'," and to explain away the ordinances and commandinents of Muhammad, the Seal of the Prophets. Have you, not yourself seen and heard of how many estates and fortunes persons ostensibly devout obtain possession, persuading themselves by their casuistry that these are tgheir lawful right and just due? Judge by this of the thousand other species of traffickings, barterings, and pleadings whereby, in diverse fashions, they compel rightful claimants to effect settlements and partial compromises. With such phrases as " I compromise," " I agree," which have now become universal technicalities, do they defraud God and man, trampling under foot the rights of their fellows, and shutting their eyes to equity and justice. This is the real meaning of infidelity, and these are the true infidels. Consider fairly: if a woman be entitled to receive a. thou- sand tu'm6nis dowry from her husband, or a sister the like sum as a legacy from her brother, and if, after the, con- clusion of the legal formalities and proceedings, she be unabl-I to enforce her just claims and be compelled to effect a compromise at one hundred tu'vzains, have those other nine hundred ta'mdns become the lawful due of those who constitute themselves her creditors, and are their consciences clear? Though the doctors of law and divinity have now given their sanction and authority to such decisions, yet are they none the less repugnant to God's good pleasure, and inconsistent with true piety and virtue. So, in like manner, if a hundred tfinza'ns of tithe' be So is God termed in two passages in the Kur'6n: iii, 47; and viii) 30. 2 In the original kliums, which signifies a proportion of one fifth of wealth acquired in war, commerce, or the like, to which PREFACE. 11 due from one of these pious believers, they will place that sum in a vessel containing oil, honey, or curdled milk, and offer it instead of the tithe to some poor Seyyid. Then for a small sum they buy back the vessel with the hundred tu'ma'??s concealed therein from the Seyyid, who, poor fellow, is quite unconscious of the way in which he has been defrauded. Or sometimes they will give one tt'im(g't~t to a poor Seyyid on condition that he accept it as a hundred tq'tnubis. By such quibbles do they mock God, and account themselves free of blame in their usurpa- tion of men's wealth. By the more utterance of the phrase " I compromise," they divest themselves of all anxiety as to the questioning of the Day of Reckoning, although they profess to believe in the holy precept "Contracts follow intentions," which, indeed, they are unable to deny. Yet, fraudulent and sophistical hypocrites that they are, they consider the wealth which they have amassed by their legal quibbles and artifices just as lawfully obtained as did the thief the shroud for his mother. For they relate that the mother of a certain thief when at the point of death besought him to obtain for her a lawful shroud'. lie assented, and sallying forth from his house at midnight lay in wait at the end of a road. By chance lie presently fell in with a poor solitary traveller who had-lagged behind the caravan, and at once took from him by force his ass and his saddle-bags. Amongst the various articles contained in the latter lie discovered several yards of linen, whereat lie rejoiced and gave thanks, saying, "Praise be to God who hath not suffered me to return disappointed and ashaiiied to my mother!" Then he fell to beating the owner of the linen with all his might, crying, "Make this linen lawful to ngie with thy the descendants of the Prophet are entitled. See Querry's Droit Musulman, vol. i, p. 175 et seq. 12 THE NEW HISTORY. whole heart 1 " On his return lie described to his mother all that had taken place, saying, "I gave the owner of the linen such a drubbing that he cried out with all his might, 'I make it lawful to thee,' repeating more than a thousand times with tears and groans, 'May it be lawful to thee!"' Now this hypocrisy, with the envy, frowardness, guile, and jealousy which are, as it were, the fourfold elements of which it is compounded, has become so engrained in this people as to be almost a second nature. Their miserable and degraded condition is entirely due to this cause, for no two individuals can unite or combine in any enterprise without quarrelling; and, should they enter into partner- ship for six months, for six years they will be wholly occupied with litigation. In short they so vex, oppress, and harass one another in every possible way that the very name of charity and courtesy would seem to be forgotten. Another offspring of this hypocrisy is injustice, which drinks milk from the breast of the false mother and draws instruction from the I in,, father, until, when it is well y t, matured and has learned to walk alone, it goes abroad to destroy the welfare of every land where it plants its foot- steps. Such is the injustice which holds absolhlite sway over this country, and to which the people (through ancient habit and long subserviency, and because, as the proverb says, "Men follow the, faith of their kings") have becoiihie as much attached as is the nightingale to the rose or the moth to the candle. Though their wings are scorched by this fire, they still whirl recklessly around it, as though eager for immolation. To adopt another simile, this in- justice is like a chronic wasting disease which is continually sapping and undermining the health of this people, who are notwithstanding so heedless of their condition that they fancy themselves better every day, and refuse to follow the advice of those wise physicians who bid them avoid that PREFACE. 13 lying and hypocrisy which generate it. Such spiritual pliysiciana~ were the prophets and saints sent for their guidance and healing, to whom, out of inere cruelty and lust of oppression, they did such things as the pen is ashamed to record. Now just as these vile qualities of which we have spoken are the cause of temporal and eternal loss and ignominy, so do kindliness, charity, and concord conduce to the welfare and progress of states and nations, and secure peace and happiness for great and small. It is impossible to do justice here to the beneficial results of these qualities, and we will only remark that true affection and charity is not that a man should love his wife, children, and kindred, or his fellow-citizens and compatriots only. He is indeed worthy of the name of man who loves all his fellow- creatures, withholds his charity from no human being, refrains from injuring by word or deed aught that has life, and neither scorns nor regards as unclean anything -which breathes, however lowly, remembering that it too stands in some relation to the Lord of the Universe, and would -not exist but for some beneficent purpose. And so the wise and humane man will not regard as accursed aught which exists, nor spurn it, nor speak evil of it, even as the Lord Jesus was once walking with some of his disciples when they came suddenly upon a dead and putrid dog, at the stench of whose corruption the disciples expressed their disgust. But he rebuked them, saying, "Why take ye heed but of the corruption of its body, and regard not its white teeth nor ponder on its defence of its master's rights and con- tentment with its lot ? Regard but what is good, if ye be of the spirit." , How far from this are some, who, instead of striving to see naught but good in all around them, occupying them- selves with the amendment of their own characters, and 14 THE NEW HISTORY. endeavouring to remove their own faults, seek only in their folly to discover blemishes in others 1 " Such an one," say these, " is unsound in his religio'Lis beliefs " ; " So-and-so is a reprobate and accursed"; "The to-Lich of Zeyd is a, pollu.- tion"; "It were a meritorious action to slay 'Amr." Only the most extravagant self-approbation and conceit can lead them to speak thus, and of all vices these are the ligiost detestable. To them is traceable in no small measure the deterioration of the Persians, their refusal to accept new idea,s, and their complete indifference -to the progress and well-being of their country, And so, in spite of all their self-esteem, they are continually going back while all other nations are advancing. Yet they themselves relate, a well- known tradition of how God bade Moses seek out some creature of less account than himself and bring it into the Divine Presence, After searching for a while Moses dis- covered the putrid carcase of a dog. Thinking that this would serve his purpose, lie attached a cord to its leg and began to drag it after him, but ere he had proceeded many steps the thought came upon him, "How dare 1 prefer myself even to this?" Even as he dropped the cord from his hand he beard a voice rebuking him and saying, "0 son of 'lmrAn, hadst thou brought that dog one step further thou wouldst have forfeited thy rank of pro- phet 1 " Far removed froin this humility of Moses (who, not- withstanding his prophetic rank and the privilege of com- muning with God which he enjoyed, dared not prefer himself to the putrid carease of a dog) is the arrogance of those who regard tliemaselves as superior to all the rest of mankind, and do not even lieasitate to rank themselves above Moses, quoting in support of their presumption the tradition, "The doctors of my church are more excellent than the prophets of the children of Israel." As to the i PREFACE. rest of God's servants, they hold them in less account than n the carcase of a dog ! In strong contrast with these are the people of Europe, who have truly apprehended the meaning of affection and concord, and have reaped from these a wondrous harvest. For, solely by reason of g the love which they bear towards their fellow-creatures, the wise men of modern Europe have devoted themselves to the devising of such appliances as may serve to lessen the sufferings of God's creatures or conduce to their prosperity and comfort, whereby also the glory of the State is increased. Thus was the power of steam discovered, whereby thousands of factories of different kinds were set in motion, many precious and wonderful goods produced, and prodigies of workmanship hitherto undreamed of accomplished. The land was delivered from the thraldom. of desolation and disorder ' the people were freed from sloth and poverty, the nation waxed rich and the state strong. Governments ceased to depend - on oppression and injustice as a means of acquiring revenue, and the practice of extorting money by threats and promises fell into d,isuse. Every effort was made to secure equal Justice for all, and every exertion put forth to perfect the mechanism of the administration. The people, thus. freed from anxiety, began to seek after education and culture, and to make rapid progress in humanity and virtue; and, since each bad his allotted share in the common work and was indispensable to the common weal, all became United in intent and purpose. Thus they made progress in every direction and became objects of emulation to all around them. Amongst these numerous inventions was the railroad, which was originally devised with the object of alleviating the sufferings endured by beasts of burden and increasing the comforts of travellers. Consider the benefits which i I ~ 16 THE NEW HISTORY. have resulted from this invention, and observe how, where- ever it goes, it furthers the prosperity of the country and the freedoiigi of the people, leaving none within the sphere of its influence poor or unemployed, and furnishing each with work suited to his capacity. How largely has it conduced to national progress, wealth, and consolidation 1 How well it shelters its patrons from the depredations of robbers, the keenness of the winter's cold, and the fierce heat of summer! Not long ago the Prime Minister of Persia, actuated solely by a desire for the welfare of his nation, sought to introduce into his country that which had elsewhere proved so beneficial. In this design, however, lie was vigorously opposed by the doctors of religion, who stirred up the people against him by telling them that the increased influx of Europeans which would result from the proposed iniiovatioigi would infallibly bring about the spread of in- fidelity and the downfall of religion. They were really actuated by a fear lest in course of time the eyes of the people might be opened and they should refuse any longer to obey them blindly. So they set themselves to discover objections and obstacles to the proposed scheme, to fabricate cc authentic" traditions, and to cast imputations of atheism on the Minister. Thus, because of their selfishness and craving for power, they would not suffer this people after a thousand years of abasement and misery to obtain peace and happiness. A certain Persian of sense and discernment wrote a pamphlet to expose the true motives of these doctors. Unfortunately, however, it was not published or circulated, for "truth is bitter," and its contents would have been so uupalatable to his antagonists that, had they seen it, they would, without stopping to consider the arguments con- tained in it, at once have declared its author an infidel. It r PREFACE. 17~ is not.unlikely that they would pronounce the same judge- ment on the author of the present work; but he, thank God, is not of this people, and cares naught for the appro- bation or resentment of any one. "I neither hearken to the Sheykh, nor hold the parson's creed ; From every sect and every faith, thank heaven, I am freed I I" Now if I have strongly and repeatedly insisted on the defects apparent in the religion of certain persons, the injustice of the government, the ignorance of the people, or the total absence of moderation and fairness in the ministers of church and state, God is my witness that I have no personal spite against any individual or class. My sole object is to arouse their zeal by bringing these matters before their notice, and to shew them the hatefulness of certain of their vices in a true light, so that they may cease to regard them as trivial, and may learn to abhor and avoid them. So also when I instance the practices of European nations in exemplification of such virtues as justice, magnanimity, charity, uprightness, and culture, and dwell on their praises, it is from no mere desire to extol my compatriots', but in the hope that'thereby I may arouse the spirit of emulation in this people, incite them to acquire these good qualities, and induce them to desist from injuring and destroying their fellow-countrymen. To return, however, to the tract of which I spoke. The author maintains that the Persians are endowed with a 1 This verse and the words immediately preceding it are noticed by Baron Rosen (Coll. Sci., vol. vi, p. 244) as affording some evidence that Minakjf, the late Zoroastrian agent at TeherAn, wrote, or caused to be written, this history. 2 It must be borne in mind that throuohout this work the 0 author maintains the fiction of his European nationality. 2 N. H. 18 THE NEW HISTORY. high degree of intelligence and aptitude, and are fully capable of improvement, but that unfortunately their rulers, fearing to lose the authority which they enjoy, will not stiffer them to open their eyes and ears, or learn to discriminate between good and evil. After establishing this thesis by conclusive arguments, lie puts forward the following allegory, observing that, as each of the ministers of state is charged with special duties, the Minister for Foreign Affairs may be likened to the sentinel who keepas guard over the citadel of the empire. And so, when one comes in the early morning and knocks at the gate of this citadel, the Minister for Foreign Affairs demands, " Who art thou, and what dost thou seek?" " I am Justice and Progress," answers the other, " and I come to establish equity, inaugurate an era of progress, and root out disorder and oppression." " Thanks be to God," answers the Minister, " that our land already enjoys the fullest measure Of justice and progress. We need you not." The other then proves to the Minister by conclusive, evidence that he is JhListice and Progress, after which he continues :- " Long ago I went forth from this country and took up my abode iigi Europe. For more than a thousand years I have not beheld this land or its people, nor set my footsteps on its soil. Learning, however, that a fraudulent impostor claiming to be myself has formed a league with Discord to lay waste the land, I have now returned, for charity's sake, to effect its regeneration. Open the door!" Z) Quoth the Minister, bolting the door more securely, Our country needs not your help. Thanks be to God, we have strong and lofty buildings." I bring from Europe," rejoins the other, "all manner of new and wonderful inventions and appliances, that I PREFACE. 1, 4.1, : : 19 y tic on, ee e peop e from misery and poverty, and make them rich, prosperous and happy like the people of Europe." "We want not your gifts," replies the Minister, "for such of these things as we need men bring from Europe, and we buy them. Besides, if our people were to become rich, they would rise in rebellion." After much discussion and argument, the Minister, unable to raise any further objections, says in a soft and wheedling tone, "Your remarks are perfectly just. Through your influence countries prosper, peoples are made free, and nations become great. But what can I do? With you here I could neither govern nor subsist, but must at once re- linquish my power, limit myself to the exercise of my proper authority, and content myself with the fixed salary paid to ine by the state. An annual income of two hundred thousand t6mrins and an annual expenditure of one hun- dred thousand would be no longer possible, inasmuch as I should be prevented from accepting gifts and bribes, and could no longer arrest, imprison, condemn, and acquit as~ I please. In spite of my lofty rank 1 should be compelled to abide by the law, nor should I be permitted even to apply a simple abusive epithet to one of my subordinates without causa. These things being -so, I cannot, so -long as I -live, admit you. But even if I were to withdraw my opposition, there is not one of the administrators of the state who would stiffer you to remain here for a single instant. They would all unite in representing you to the Privy Council as an enemy to His Majesty the King, and would forthwith issue orders for your execution. But even leaving this out of account, the doctors of religion, on becoming aware of your arrival, would at once assemble and produce a thousand well-authenticated and accredited traditions against you. That they would kill you is a mere nothing, for they regard 2-2 20 THE NEW HISTORY. PREFACE. 21" i it as obligatory on every MusuhnAn to drink your blood abasement is the prevailing lack of justice and absence and eat your flesh, and if one should so much as mention of generous feeling. Not that they have not a certain your name they declare him an infidel deserving of death. kind of justice of their own, but it is like the piety of That they would not suffer~ you to remain in this country the Hindoos and Jews', which doth but conduce to their for a single moment is also nothing, for wherever they greater error. Nor are they devoid of all social instincts recognize one of your friends and admirers they slay him and power of combination, but their concord is the concord without a moment's respite. They regard all Europeans as, of wolves, who appear friendly while face to face,'but, so enemies who inay be lawfully plundered and slain solely soon as one relaxes his attention in the least degree and because of the love which these bear you. The massacres suffers sleep to overcome him, they tear him in pieces. So and persecutions of the BàbÕs-a sect so remarkable for do they combine to plunder, but afterwards quarrel over their steadfastness and earnestness of purpose-were also the spoil. brought about entirely by their devotion to you; else why How much better have the people of Europe ap- do the MusulmAns refrain from interfering with the Nu- prehended the true ideal of friendship! Some years ago aseyrfs and GhAlis (whom their clergy regard as utter they announced in all their newspapera-, that in the opinion heretics), the KhArijfs, the eleven unorthodox sects of of experts all the coal-miDes in the world would be ex- ImAmites, the SAdikfs and Ni'u'sfs (who hold that the hausted in a thousand (or, as others maintained, in less linAmate ceased with the ImAm Ja'far-i-SAdik, and regard than four hundred) years; that then all the railways and him as the promised Mahdf), and the MukhtArfs' (who factories in the world which are worked with coal would assert that Muhammad ibiih Hanafiyya was the expected be brought to a standstill and rendered useless; and that ImAm), all of w,hom are a hundred thousand times worse any one who should succeed in devising some substitute than the BàbÕs?" It for coal would confer a benefit upon his own and all What the learned author of this tract wished to shew nations, and would receive a pension for himself and his was that these people have neither care nor compassion for heirs in perpetuity. Such people, who concern themselves their agiibor(linates, being concerned only about the pre- about the welfare of those who shall come into the world servation of their own power, and not at all about the several hundred years hence, may indeed be said to have protection of those committed to their charge. Had it grasped the true meaning of affection 1 This is why they been otherwise, the people would never have sunk into have made, and still continue to make, countless dis- ago degraded a condition nor have become so despicable coveries in the application of electricity, compressed air, in the eyes of foreign states, for the cause of this national and the like. Accounts of these sects will be found as follows i When I was on my way to Persia I met in Alexandria n one of my friends who had reasided for some while in that Shabrist~ufs Ifit(ibit'l-9nilal (ed. Cureton):-the Nuseyriyya, p. 143; the Ghulit or Ghiliya, p. 132; the Khirijiyya, p. 85; the Iminiiyya, p. 122; the S6dikiyya or Ja'fariyya, 1). 124; the C. reads "'Alagians," but it seems unlikely that Aldnakjf MYlsiyya, p. 126; the Mukhtiriyya, p. 109. would have gone out of his way to speak ill of his own people. 22 THE NEW HISTORY. PREFACE. 23 country, and lie remarked to me, " Persia has great natural the people toiadopt this custoin, it is best that they should' resources, but the people are devoid of kindliness." Thia3 observe the second condition, and, by means of fair- dis- was exactly what I ngiyself afterwards observed. it is this cussioD, remove dissent from their religion, so that concord lack of kindliness which causes them to hold alooffrom may be established and peace succeed all this dissension their fellow-men, and thereby to cut themselves off from and strife. the possibility of happiness and progress. So, in course of Now although there are amongst the Muhannuadans time, these misunderstandings and differences which have more than seventy different sects, each of which is further ar brought about their ruin C ose, and *Ttlie government was split up into several subdivisions, these, though they may thus enabledl* to usurp a tyrannous sway. Now until hold aloof from each other, are not at enmity and strife; they make the recovery of this concord and harniony the for ages have elapsed since their differences first appeared. object of their endeavours it is impossible for them to But in the case of the Bdbis, who are of recent origin, they make any progress in civilization. And the conditions make the most strenuous and persistent efforts to harass under which the attainment of this end is possible are and hurt them in every way, seizing, imprisoning, and two. The first is that they should follow the example of slaying them with unremitting enery and this notwit - 0y) European nations, and refrain from interfering in any way standing that they know nothing of their beliefs, and with the religious opinions of their fel